LRGF vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRGF is a Hold and SNPS is a Hold.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LRGF | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 87% | 15 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RERHX | 57.56 | -0.20 | -0.35% |
| American Funds Europacific Growth R5E | |||
| CMTFX | 94.65 | -0.74 | -0.78% |
| Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst | |||
| HNMVX | 27.89 | -0.28 | -0.99% |
| Harbor Mid Cap Value Retirement | |||
| VCSLX | 17.18 | -0.20 | -1.15% |
| VALIC Company I Small Cap Index | |||
| NSMCX | 26.27 | -0.34 | -1.28% |
| Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value C | |||
LRGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRGF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRGF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRGF | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| CDNS - LRGF | 71% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| SNPS - LRGF | 71% Closely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| LRCX - LRGF | 71% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| KLAC - LRGF | 70% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| MCHP - LRGF | 70% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 85% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| RIOT - SNPS | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||