Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRRRX vs TRIZX
LRRRX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRRRX has more cash in the bank: 4.68B vs. TRIZX (4.23B). TRIZX pays higher dividends than LRRRX: TRIZX (8.33) vs LRRRX (7.50). LRRRX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: LRRRX (17 years) vs TRIZX (5 years). LRRRX (1.10) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.62). LRRRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.00 vs. TRIZX (77.90). LRRRX (0) and TRIZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. LRRRX (6.16). TRIZX return over 5 years is better than : 41.83 vs. LRRRX (35.86).
| LRRRX | TRIZX | LRRRX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.02 | 5,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.62 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.416 | 2.411 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.68B | 4.23B | 111% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.50 | 8.33 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.16 | 8.10 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.63 | 31.73 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.86 | 41.83 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.35 | N/A | - |