Ad is loading...
LSAGX vs NPFCX
LSAGX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSAGX vs NPFCX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth A
Price$19.37
Change+$1.81 (+10.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.44M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$54.57
Change+$3.98 (+7.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets122.54B
LSAGX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSAGX vs. NPFCX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSAGX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 123B vs. LSAGX (94.4M). LSAGX (0.00) and NPFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . LSAGX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: LSAGX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than LSAGX (1.38). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSAGX (6.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSAGX: NPFCX (250) vs LSAGX (2500). LSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.06 vs. NPFCX (-10.63). LSAGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.49 vs. NPFCX (30.30).
| LSAGX | NPFCX | LSAGX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.48 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.48 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.591 | -12.625 | 116% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.4M | 123B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.06 | -10.63 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.30 | -7.88 | -131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.49 | 30.30 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers