Ad is loading...
LSAGX vs RNPFX
LSAGX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts LSAGX vs RNPFX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth A
Price$20.76
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.98M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$63.52
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.32B
LSAGX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSAGX vs. RNPFX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSAGX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. LSAGX (120M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: RNPFX (0.82) vs LSAGX (0.00). LSAGX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: LSAGX (9 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). LSAGX (1.38) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSAGX (6.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSAGX: RNPFX (250) vs LSAGX (2500). LSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.76 vs. RNPFX (5.68). RNPFX (48.27) and LSAGX (46.51) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LSAGX | RNPFX | LSAGX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.46 | 261% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.46 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.973 | 2.386 | 41% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 120M | 142B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.82 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.76 | 5.68 | 295% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.03 | 28.41 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.51 | 48.27 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.66 | - |