LSANF
Price
$4.35
Change
-$0.13 (-2.90%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
256.54M
LUNMF
Price
$10.93
Change
-$0.15 (-1.35%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.88B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LSANF vs LUNMF

Header iconLSANF vs LUNMF Comparison
Open Charts LSANF vs LUNMFBanner chart's image
Los Andes Copper
Price$4.35
Change-$0.13 (-2.90%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization256.54M
Lundin Mining
Price$10.93
Change-$0.15 (-1.35%)
Volume$178.8K
Capitalization6.88B
LSANF vs LUNMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LSANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LSANF vs. LUNMF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSANF is a Hold and LUNMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (LSANF: $4.35 vs. LUNMF: $10.93)
Brand notoriety: LSANF and LUNMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSANF: 104% vs. LUNMF: 21%
Market capitalization -- LSANF: $256.54M vs. LUNMF: $6.88B
LSANF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $256.54M. LUNMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $6.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSANF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLUNMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LSANF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LUNMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUNMF is a better buy in the long-term than LSANF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LSANF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUNMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LSANF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LUNMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LSANF is a better buy in the short-term than LUNMF.

Price Growth

LSANF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.90% price change this week, while LUNMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUNMF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUNMF($6.88B) has a higher market cap than LSANF($257M). LUNMF YTD gains are higher at: 26.945 vs. LSANF (-20.183). LUNMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 903M vs. LSANF (-5.59M). LUNMF has more cash in the bank: 184M vs. LSANF (1.91M). LSANF has less debt than LUNMF: LSANF (4.29M) vs LUNMF (215M). LUNMF has higher revenues than LSANF: LUNMF (2.8B) vs LSANF (0).
LSANFLUNMFLSANF / LUNMF
Capitalization257M6.88B4%
EBITDA-5.59M903M-1%
Gain YTD-20.18326.945-75%
P/E RatioN/A31.55-
Revenue02.8B-
Total Cash1.91M184M1%
Total Debt4.29M215M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LSANF vs LUNMF: Fundamental Ratings
LSANF
LUNMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7653
SMR RATING
1..100
7890
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8340
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9146
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUNMF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSANF (70). This means that LUNMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSANF’s over the last 12 months.

LUNMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LSANF (76). This means that LUNMF’s stock grew similarly to LSANF’s over the last 12 months.

LSANF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as LUNMF (90). This means that LSANF’s stock grew similarly to LUNMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUNMF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSANF (83). This means that LUNMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSANF’s over the last 12 months.

LUNMF's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSANF (91). This means that LUNMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSANF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSANFLUNMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LSANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USAWX32.190.17
+0.53%
Victory Sustainable World
OFAFX27.710.09
+0.33%
Olstein All Cap Value Adv
TMCTX55.340.18
+0.33%
Touchstone Mid Cap Z
LHCFX18.590.04
+0.22%
Lord Abbett Health Care F
CREYX9.790.02
+0.20%
Columbia Real Estate Equity Inst3

LSANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSANF and FQVLF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSANF and FQVLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSANF
1D Price
Change %
LSANF100%
N/A
FQVLF - LSANF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
LUNMF - LSANF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
LYSCF - LSANF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
LTMCF - LSANF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
LYSDY - LSANF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More

LUNMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUNMF has been closely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUNMF jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUNMF
1D Price
Change %
LUNMF100%
-1.35%
HBM - LUNMF
80%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
FCX - LUNMF
78%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
SCCO - LUNMF
76%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
IVPAF - LUNMF
75%
Closely correlated
-2.69%
TECK - LUNMF
74%
Closely correlated
-2.13%
More