Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSBRX vs PIPNX
LSBRX vs PIPNX Comparison
Open Charts LSBRX vs PIPNX
Loomis Sayles Bond Retail
Price$11.80
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.35B
LSBRX vs PIPNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSBRX vs. PIPNX commentary
Jun 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSBRX is a Buy and PIPNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIPNX has more cash in the bank: 181B vs. LSBRX (4.35B). PIPNX pays higher dividends than LSBRX: PIPNX (6.06) vs LSBRX (5.21). LSBRX was incepted earlier than PIPNX: LSBRX (28 years) vs PIPNX (7 years). PIPNX (1.03) is less costly to investors than LSBRX (0.97). PIPNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 588.00 vs. LSBRX (62.00). LSBRX has a lower initial minimum investment than PIPNX: LSBRX (0) vs PIPNX (1000000). LSBRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.03 vs. PIPNX (8.33). PIPNX return over 5 years is better than : 22.92 vs. LSBRX (15.65).
| LSBRX | PIPNX | LSBRX / PIPNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.98 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.03 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.188 | 3.532 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.35B | 181B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.21 | 6.06 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | 8.33 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.92 | 16.84 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.65 | 22.92 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement