Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSBRX vs PIPNX
LSBRX vs PIPNX Comparison
Open Charts LSBRX vs PIPNX
Loomis Sayles Bond Retail
Price$11.92
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.38B
LSBRX vs PIPNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSBRX vs. PIPNX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSBRX is a Buy and PIPNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIPNX has more cash in the bank: 188B vs. LSBRX (4.38B). PIPNX pays higher dividends than LSBRX: PIPNX (5.98) vs LSBRX (5.15). LSBRX was incepted earlier than PIPNX: LSBRX (29 years) vs PIPNX (7 years). PIPNX (1.03) is less costly to investors than LSBRX (0.97). PIPNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 711.00 vs. LSBRX (62.00). LSBRX has a lower initial minimum investment than PIPNX: LSBRX (2500) vs PIPNX (1000000). LSBRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.17 vs. PIPNX (6.65). PIPNX return over 5 years is better than : 20.96 vs. LSBRX (13.44).
| LSBRX | PIPNX | LSBRX / PIPNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.98 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.03 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.412 | 4.346 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.38B | 188B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.15 | 5.98 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.17 | 6.65 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.98 | 21.68 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.44 | 20.96 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers