Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSCDX vs VFSUX
LSCDX vs VFSUX Comparison
Open Charts LSCDX vs VFSUX
Loomis Sayles Interm Duration Bond C
Price$9.62
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.03M
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Adm
Price$10.44
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.46B
LSCDX vs VFSUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCDX vs. VFSUX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCDX is a Hold and VFSUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFSUX has more cash in the bank: 52.5B vs. LSCDX (237M). VFSUX pays higher dividends than LSCDX: VFSUX (4.41) vs LSCDX (3.23). LSCDX was incepted earlier than VFSUX: LSCDX (9 years) vs VFSUX (24 years). LSCDX (1.48) is less costly to investors than VFSUX (0.09). LSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. VFSUX (75.00). LSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFSUX: LSCDX (2500) vs VFSUX (50000). LSCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. VFSUX (2.64). LSCDX return over 5 years is better than : -3.42 vs. VFSUX (-4.11).
| LSCDX | VFSUX | LSCDX / VFSUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.09 | 1,556% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.09 | 1,644% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.282 | 1.643 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 50000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 237M | 52.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.23 | 4.41 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.28 | 2.64 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.33 | 3.76 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.42 | -4.11 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 6.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers