Ad is loading...
LSCGX vs NPFCX
LSCGX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSCGX vs NPFCX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$20.41
Change+$0.09 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$63.19
Change-$0.16 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LSCGX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCGX vs. NPFCX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCGX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 149B vs. LSCGX (113M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: NPFCX (0.20) vs LSCGX (0.00). LSCGX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: LSCGX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). LSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. NPFCX (17.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: NPFCX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.42 vs. NPFCX (22.22). LSCGX return over 5 years is better than : 45.16 vs. NPFCX (36.81).
| LSCGX | NPFCX | LSCGX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.932 | 20.638 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113M | 149B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.42 | 22.22 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.04 | 5.32 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.16 | 36.81 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers