Ad is loading...
LSCGX vs NPFCX
LSCGX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSCGX vs NPFCX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$17.86
Change-$0.88 (-4.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.14M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$55.04
Change-$2.29 (-3.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.04B
LSCGX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCGX vs. NPFCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCGX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. LSCGX (108M). LSCGX (0.00) and NPFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . LSCGX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: LSCGX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). LSCGX (2.14) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.48). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: NPFCX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.28 vs. NPFCX (1.31). NPFCX (62.26) and LSCGX (60.58) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LSCGX | NPFCX | LSCGX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.48 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.48 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.396 | -0.984 | 243% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 108M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.28 | 1.31 | 863% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.18 | 0.31 | 5,294% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.58 | 62.26 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...