Ad is loading...
LSDOX vs MTLFX
LSDOX vs MTLFX Comparison
Open Charts LSDOX vs MTLFX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free F3
Price$15.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity A
Price$7.91
Change+$0.01 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.62B
LSDOX vs MTLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSDOX vs. MTLFX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSDOX is a Hold and MTLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTLFX has more cash in the bank: 2.62B vs. LSDOX (1.57B). LSDOX pays higher dividends than MTLFX: LSDOX (3.10) vs MTLFX (2.94). LSDOX was incepted earlier than MTLFX: LSDOX (8 years) vs MTLFX (33 years). MTLFX (0.72) is less costly to investors than LSDOX (0.42). LSDOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. MTLFX (30.00). LSDOX has a lower initial minimum investment than MTLFX: LSDOX (0) vs MTLFX (1000). MTLFX (3.14) and LSDOX (3.01) have marching annual gain over last year. MTLFX return over 5 years is better than : 7.84 vs. LSDOX (6.97).
| LSDOX | MTLFX | LSDOX / MTLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.59 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.72 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.222 | 0.134 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 2.62B | 60% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.10 | 2.94 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.01 | 3.14 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.45 | 7.71 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.97 | 7.84 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...