Ad is loading...
LSGGX vs NPFCX
LSGGX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSGGX vs NPFCX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Y
Price$20.48
Change+$0.19 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.15M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$57.33
Change+$0.34 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.04B
LSGGX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSGGX vs. NPFCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSGGX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. LSGGX (107M). LSGGX (0.00) and NPFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . LSGGX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: LSGGX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than LSGGX (1.14). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSGGX (6.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGGX: NPFCX (250) vs LSGGX (100000). LSGGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.67 vs. NPFCX (1.83). LSGGX return over 5 years is better than : 68.80 vs. NPFCX (62.26).
| LSGGX | NPFCX | LSGGX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.48 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.48 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.058 | -0.984 | 311% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 107M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.67 | 1.83 | 638% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.50 | 1.62 | 1,328% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.80 | 62.26 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers