Ad is loading...
LSNGX vs NPFCX
LSNGX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSNGX vs NPFCX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$20.40
Change+$0.49 (+2.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.73M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$56.83
Change+$1.08 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.95B
LSNGX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSNGX vs. NPFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSNGX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. LSNGX (109M). LSNGX (0.00) and NPFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . LSNGX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: LSNGX (8 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than LSNGX (1.06). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSNGX (6.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: NPFCX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.84 vs. NPFCX (3.21). LSNGX return over 5 years is better than : 48.03 vs. NPFCX (41.75).
| LSNGX | NPFCX | LSNGX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.48 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.48 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.145 | -1.848 | 278% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.84 | 3.21 | 430% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.12 | 9.15 | 351% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.03 | 41.75 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...