Ad is loading...
LSNGX vs NPFCX
LSNGX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSNGX vs NPFCX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$19.58
Change-$0.96 (-4.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.14M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$55.04
Change-$2.29 (-3.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.04B
LSNGX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSNGX vs. NPFCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSNGX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. LSNGX (108M). LSNGX (0.00) and NPFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . LSNGX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: LSNGX (8 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than LSNGX (1.06). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSNGX (6.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: NPFCX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.49 vs. NPFCX (1.31). LSNGX return over 5 years is better than : 70.74 vs. NPFCX (62.26).
| LSNGX | NPFCX | LSNGX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.48 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.48 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.144 | -0.984 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 108M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.49 | 1.31 | 955% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.26 | 0.31 | 6,627% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.74 | 62.26 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...