Ad is loading...
LSNGX vs NPFCX
LSNGX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSNGX vs NPFCX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$20.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$60.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSNGX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
LSNGX vs. NPFCX commentary
Sep 20, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSNGX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. LSNGX (100M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: NPFCX (0.20) vs LSNGX (0.00). LSNGX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: LSNGX (7 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). LSNGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. NPFCX (17.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: NPFCX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.99 vs. NPFCX (17.02). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.24 vs. LSNGX (36.43).
| LSNGX | NPFCX | LSNGX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.836 | 13.841 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 100M | 142B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.99 | 17.02 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.34 | -8.69 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.43 | 39.24 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...