LTM vs VLRS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTM is a Hold and VLRS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LTM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVLRS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LTM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- VLRS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LTM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLRS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LTM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- VLRS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LTM (@Airlines) experienced а -0.51% price change this week, while VLRS (@Airlines) price change was -7.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was -4.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
LTM is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.
VLRS is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Airlines (-4.63% weekly)Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.
| LTM | VLRS | LTM / VLRS | |
| Capitalization | 9.4B | 604M | 1,556% |
| EBITDA | 1.82B | 522M | 348% |
| Gain YTD | 13.125 | -29.435 | -45% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.65 | 4.86 | 199% |
| Revenue | 12.8B | 3.21B | 399% |
| Total Cash | 2.01B | 821M | 245% |
| Total Debt | 7.15B | 3.73B | 192% |
LTM | VLRS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 85 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VLRS's Valuation (47) in the Airlines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTM (99). This means that VLRS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTM’s over the last 12 months.
LTM's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Airlines industry is significantly better than the same rating for VLRS (100). This means that LTM’s stock grew significantly faster than VLRS’s over the last 12 months.
LTM's SMR Rating (11) in the Airlines industry is in the same range as VLRS (14). This means that LTM’s stock grew similarly to VLRS’s over the last 12 months.
LTM's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Airlines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VLRS (85). This means that LTM’s stock grew somewhat faster than VLRS’s over the last 12 months.
LTM's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Airlines industry is in the same range as VLRS (100). This means that LTM’s stock grew similarly to VLRS’s over the last 12 months.
| LTM | VLRS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 73% | 16 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 78% |
LTM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LTM and AFLYY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTM and AFLYY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| AFLYY - LTM | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| ULCC - LTM | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VLRS - LTM | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNCY - LTM | 13% Poorly correlated | +5.96% | ||
| AAL - LTM | 10% Poorly correlated | +2.82% | ||
More | ||||
VLRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VLRS has been loosely correlated with UAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VLRS jumps, then UAL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VLRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VLRS | 100% | N/A | ||
| UAL - VLRS | 46% Loosely correlated | +4.65% | ||
| GOLLQ - VLRS | 41% Loosely correlated | +20.00% | ||
| ALK - VLRS | 40% Loosely correlated | +4.28% | ||
| DAL - VLRS | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| ACDVF - VLRS | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||