Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTNCX vs SFCNX
LTNCX vs SFCNX Comparison
Open Charts LTNCX vs SFCNX
Invesco Rochester® Limited Tm NY Mncpl C
Price$2.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
Allspring California Ltd-Trm Tx-FrInst
Price$10.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.56M
LTNCX vs SFCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTNCX vs. SFCNX commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTNCX is a Hold and SFCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTNCX has more cash in the bank: 1.41B vs. SFCNX (329M). LTNCX pays higher dividends than SFCNX: LTNCX (2.68) vs SFCNX (2.49). LTNCX was incepted earlier than SFCNX: LTNCX (28 years) vs SFCNX (11 years). LTNCX (1.58) is less costly to investors than SFCNX (0.54). LTNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. SFCNX (24.00). LTNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCNX: LTNCX (1000) vs SFCNX (1000000). SFCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.25 vs. LTNCX (-0.25). SFCNX return over 5 years is better than : 3.73 vs. LTNCX (0.81).
| LTNCX | SFCNX | LTNCX / SFCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.50 | 316% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.54 | 293% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.830 | 1.767 | -47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 329M | 428% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 2.49 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.25 | 3.25 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.69 | 7.84 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.81 | 3.73 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.21 | 8.48 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement