Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTNSX vs MISHX
LTNSX vs MISHX Comparison
Open Charts LTNSX vs MISHX
Lord Abbett National Tax Free C
Price$10.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.52B
AB Municipal Income
Price$10.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.23B
LTNSX vs MISHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTNSX vs. MISHX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTNSX is a Hold and MISHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MISHX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. LTNSX (4.52B). MISHX pays higher dividends than LTNSX: MISHX (4.60) vs LTNSX (3.18). LTNSX was incepted earlier than MISHX: LTNSX (29 years) vs MISHX (15 years). LTNSX (1.39) is less costly to investors than MISHX (0.22). LTNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. MISHX (17.00). MISHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LTNSX: MISHX (0) vs LTNSX (1000). MISHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.58 vs. LTNSX (-0.92). MISHX return over 5 years is better than : 8.41 vs. LTNSX (-2.59).
| LTNSX | MISHX | LTNSX / MISHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.22 | 632% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.22 | 632% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.615 | -0.571 | 458% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.52B | 15.2B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 4.60 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.92 | 1.58 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.53 | 10.10 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.59 | 8.41 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.68 | 19.13 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers