LUCMF
Price
$0.98
Change
+$0.09 (+10.11%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
49.71M
TGB
Price
$2.08
Change
+$0.02 (+0.97%)
Updated
May 22, 04:30 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
626.06M
69 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUCMF vs TGB

Header iconLUCMF vs TGB Comparison
Open Charts LUCMF vs TGBBanner chart's image
LUCA MINING
Price$0.98
Change+$0.09 (+10.11%)
Volume$234.32K
Capitalization49.71M
Taseko Mines
Price$2.08
Change+$0.02 (+0.97%)
Volume$4.1K
Capitalization626.06M
LUCMF vs TGB Comparison Chart
Loading...
LUCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUCMF vs. TGB commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUCMF is a StrongBuy and TGB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (LUCMF: $0.98 vs. TGB: $2.06)
Brand notoriety: LUCMF and TGB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUCMF: 56% vs. TGB: 69%
Market capitalization -- LUCMF: $49.71M vs. TGB: $626.06M
LUCMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $49.71M. TGB’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $626.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUCMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTGB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LUCMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TGB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUCMF is a better buy in the long-term than TGB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUCMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUCMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TGB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TGB is a better buy in the short-term than LUCMF.

Price Growth

LUCMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +13.32% price change this week, while TGB (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

TGB is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.23% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TGB($626M) has a higher market cap than LUCMF($49.7M). TGB has higher P/E ratio than LUCMF: TGB (10.57) vs LUCMF (1.17). LUCMF YTD gains are higher at: 151.321 vs. TGB (6.186). TGB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 125M vs. LUCMF (-4.28M). TGB has more cash in the bank: 83.5M vs. LUCMF (3.62M). LUCMF has less debt than TGB: LUCMF (43.8M) vs TGB (707M). TGB has higher revenues than LUCMF: TGB (472M) vs LUCMF (65.1M).
LUCMFTGBLUCMF / TGB
Capitalization49.7M626M8%
EBITDA-4.28M125M-3%
Gain YTD151.3216.1862,446%
P/E Ratio1.1710.5711%
Revenue65.1M472M14%
Total Cash3.62M83.5M4%
Total Debt43.8M707M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUCMF vs TGB: Fundamental Ratings
LUCMF
TGB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5119
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8939
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3676
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
497
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUCMF's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as TGB (77) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUCMF’s stock grew similarly to TGB’s over the last 12 months.

TGB's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LUCMF (89) in the null industry. This means that TGB’s stock grew somewhat faster than LUCMF’s over the last 12 months.

TGB's SMR Rating (100) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as LUCMF (100) in the null industry. This means that TGB’s stock grew similarly to LUCMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUCMF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGB (76) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUCMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGB’s over the last 12 months.

LUCMF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TGB (97) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUCMF’s stock grew significantly faster than TGB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUCMFTGB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XEMD42.27-0.31
-0.72%
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD EM 1-10 Yr BdETF
PCY19.44-0.27
-1.37%
Invesco Emerging Markets Sov Debt ETF
GDE44.59-0.73
-1.61%
WisdomTree Efcnt Gld Pls Eq Stgy ETF
IVE188.10-3.44
-1.80%
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF
LCG30.05-0.57
-1.86%
Sterling Capital Focus Equity ETF

LUCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LUCMF and AAGFF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LUCMF and AAGFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUCMF
1D Price
Change %
LUCMF100%
+9.49%
AAGFF - LUCMF
33%
Poorly correlated
+5.54%
AOTVF - LUCMF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
LUNMF - LUCMF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
TGB - LUCMF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARREF - LUCMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
More