LUNMF
Price
$8.58
Change
+$0.28 (+3.37%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
60 days until earnings call
SCCO
Price
$93.02
Change
+$1.04 (+1.13%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
39 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LUNMF vs SCCO

Header iconLUNMF vs SCCO Comparison
Open Charts LUNMF vs SCCOBanner chart's image
Lundin Mining
Price$8.58
Change+$0.28 (+3.37%)
Volume$338.14K
CapitalizationN/A
Southern Copper
Price$93.02
Change+$1.04 (+1.13%)
Volume$8.69K
CapitalizationN/A
LUNMF vs SCCO Comparison Chart
Loading...
LUNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUNMF vs. SCCO commentary
Dec 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUNMF is a Hold and SCCO is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 22, 2024
Stock price -- (LUNMF: $8.58 vs. SCCO: $93.01)
Brand notoriety: LUNMF and SCCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUNMF: 301% vs. SCCO: 112%
Market capitalization -- LUNMF: $6.88B vs. SCCO: $82.35B
LUNMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $6.88B. SCCO’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $82.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUNMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCCO’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LUNMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCCO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCCO is a better buy in the long-term than LUNMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUNMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCCO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUNMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SCCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LUNMF is a better buy in the short-term than SCCO.

Price Growth

LUNMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -4.79% price change this week, while SCCO (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUNMF is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

SCCO is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.74% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCCO($82.4B) has a higher market cap than LUNMF($6.88B). SCCO has higher P/E ratio than LUNMF: SCCO (34.09) vs LUNMF (31.55). SCCO YTD gains are higher at: 12.979 vs. LUNMF (4.634). SCCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.12B vs. LUNMF (903M). SCCO has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. LUNMF (184M). LUNMF has less debt than SCCO: LUNMF (215M) vs SCCO (7.03B). SCCO has higher revenues than LUNMF: SCCO (9.9B) vs LUNMF (2.8B).
LUNMFSCCOLUNMF / SCCO
Capitalization6.88B82.4B8%
EBITDA903M5.12B18%
Gain YTD4.63412.97936%
P/E Ratio31.5534.0993%
Revenue2.8B9.9B28%
Total Cash184M1.75B11%
Total Debt215M7.03B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUNMF vs SCCO: Fundamental Ratings
LUNMF
SCCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5057
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6215
SMR RATING
1..100
8126
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6361
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9146
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUNMF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as SCCO (9) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that LUNMF’s stock grew similarly to SCCO’s over the last 12 months.

SCCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LUNMF (62) in the null industry. This means that SCCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than LUNMF’s over the last 12 months.

SCCO's SMR Rating (26) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LUNMF (81) in the null industry. This means that SCCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than LUNMF’s over the last 12 months.

SCCO's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as LUNMF (63) in the null industry. This means that SCCO’s stock grew similarly to LUNMF’s over the last 12 months.

SCCO's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LUNMF (91) in the null industry. This means that SCCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than LUNMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUNMFSCCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LUNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CIHKY24.930.52
+2.13%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
KNBWY13.260.07
+0.53%
Kirin Holdings Co., Ltd.
QUEXF0.55N/A
+0.47%
Q2 METALS CORP
BRDCY16.810.07
+0.42%
Bridgestone Corp.
TCCPY3.62-0.06
-1.66%
Technopro Holdings Inc.

LUNMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUNMF has been closely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUNMF jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUNMF
1D Price
Change %
LUNMF100%
+3.43%
HBM - LUNMF
80%
Closely correlated
+4.17%
FCX - LUNMF
78%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
SCCO - LUNMF
76%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
IVPAF - LUNMF
75%
Closely correlated
+2.77%
TECK - LUNMF
74%
Closely correlated
+2.38%
More

SCCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCCO has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCCO jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCCO
1D Price
Change %
SCCO100%
+1.12%
FCX - SCCO
84%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
TECK - SCCO
81%
Closely correlated
+2.38%
HBM - SCCO
80%
Closely correlated
+4.17%
LUNMF - SCCO
76%
Closely correlated
+3.43%
GLNCY - SCCO
74%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
More