LUNMF
Price
$10.93
Change
-$0.15 (-1.35%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.88B
33 days until earnings call
TCKRF
Price
$33.50
Change
-$0.34 (-1.00%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
20.17B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUNMF vs TCKRF

Header iconLUNMF vs TCKRF Comparison
Open Charts LUNMF vs TCKRFBanner chart's image
Lundin Mining
Price$10.93
Change-$0.15 (-1.35%)
Volume$178.8K
Capitalization6.88B
Teck Resources
Price$33.50
Change-$0.34 (-1.00%)
Volume$523
Capitalization20.17B
LUNMF vs TCKRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LUNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCKRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUNMF vs. TCKRF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUNMF is a Buy and TCKRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (LUNMF: $10.93 vs. TCKRF: $33.50)
Brand notoriety: LUNMF and TCKRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUNMF: 21% vs. TCKRF: 180%
Market capitalization -- LUNMF: $6.88B vs. TCKRF: $20.17B
LUNMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $6.88B. TCKRF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $20.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUNMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTCKRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LUNMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TCKRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUNMF is a better buy in the long-term than TCKRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUNMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCKRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUNMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TCKRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LUNMF is a better buy in the short-term than TCKRF.

Price Growth

LUNMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.37% price change this week, while TCKRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUNMF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TCKRF($20.2B) has a higher market cap than LUNMF($6.88B). LUNMF has higher P/E ratio than TCKRF: LUNMF (31.55) vs TCKRF (12.90). LUNMF YTD gains are higher at: 26.945 vs. TCKRF (-17.488). TCKRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.61B vs. LUNMF (903M). TCKRF has more cash in the bank: 1.34B vs. LUNMF (184M). LUNMF has less debt than TCKRF: LUNMF (215M) vs TCKRF (10.7B). TCKRF has higher revenues than LUNMF: TCKRF (14B) vs LUNMF (2.8B).
LUNMFTCKRFLUNMF / TCKRF
Capitalization6.88B20.2B34%
EBITDA903M5.61B16%
Gain YTD26.945-17.488-154%
P/E Ratio31.5512.90245%
Revenue2.8B14B20%
Total Cash184M1.34B14%
Total Debt215M10.7B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUNMF vs TCKRF: Fundamental Ratings
LUNMF
TCKRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
534
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5361
SMR RATING
1..100
9087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4083
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
451
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUNMF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TCKRF (96). This means that LUNMF’s stock grew significantly faster than TCKRF’s over the last 12 months.

LUNMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as TCKRF (61). This means that LUNMF’s stock grew similarly to TCKRF’s over the last 12 months.

TCKRF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as LUNMF (90). This means that TCKRF’s stock grew similarly to LUNMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUNMF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCKRF (83). This means that LUNMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCKRF’s over the last 12 months.

TCKRF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LUNMF (45). This means that TCKRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LUNMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUNMFTCKRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
80%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCKRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGDV25.550.18
+0.71%
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF
IDVO34.430.16
+0.47%
Amplify CWP International Enh Div IncETF
UNOV36.240.13
+0.35%
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF Nov
FBUF28.160.10
+0.35%
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF
TAGG42.50-0.13
-0.30%
T. Rowe Price QM US Bond ETF

LUNMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUNMF has been closely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUNMF jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUNMF
1D Price
Change %
LUNMF100%
-1.35%
HBM - LUNMF
80%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
FCX - LUNMF
78%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
SCCO - LUNMF
76%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
IVPAF - LUNMF
75%
Closely correlated
-2.69%
TECK - LUNMF
74%
Closely correlated
-2.13%
More

TCKRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCKRF and AFMJF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCKRF and AFMJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCKRF
1D Price
Change %
TCKRF100%
N/A
AFMJF - TCKRF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
LTRBF - TCKRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERO - TCKRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.81%
IE - TCKRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
LUNMF - TCKRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
More