It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LZM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTAL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LZM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTAL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
LZM (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -9.39% price change this week, while MTAL (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -9.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.
LZM is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
MTAL is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
LZM | MTAL | LZM / MTAL | |
Capitalization | 628M | 902M | 70% |
EBITDA | -32.95M | -1.68M | 1,962% |
Gain YTD | -29.535 | -5.744 | 514% |
P/E Ratio | 1250.00 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.32M | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 44.4M | 35.1K | 126,496% |
Total Debt | 496K | 1.46M | 34% |
LZM | MTAL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago41% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago29% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago33% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago38% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago34% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago88% | 13 days ago56% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago51% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago26% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 7 days ago23% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
IMEGX | 19.91 | 0.02 | +0.10% |
Delaware Ivy Systematic Em Mkts Eq R6 | |||
SMINX | 11.24 | -0.04 | -0.35% |
SEI Tax-Managed Intl Mgd Vol F (SIMT) | |||
MDOEX | 10.31 | -0.07 | -0.67% |
Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity I | |||
PLFSX | 29.11 | -0.39 | -1.32% |
Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index R4 | |||
HISGX | 11.51 | -0.21 | -1.79% |
Harbor Small Cap Growth Inv |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LZM and MTAL have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LZM and MTAL's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LZM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LZM | 100% | -5.35% | ||
MTAL - LZM | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.40% | ||
AAGFF - LZM | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.83% | ||
VZLA - LZM | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.29% | ||
LITOF - LZM | 22% Poorly correlated | -6.34% | ||
IE - LZM | 22% Poorly correlated | -5.96% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTAL has been loosely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTAL jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MTAL | 100% | -3.40% | ||
TECK - MTAL | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
HBM - MTAL | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
FMCXF - MTAL | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
NSTC - MTAL | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
SCCO - MTAL | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
More |