It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LZM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTAL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LZM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTAL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
LZM (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -15.33% price change this week, while MTAL (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -11.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -2.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.00%.
LZM is expected to report earnings on May 19, 2025.
MTAL is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
LZM | MTAL | LZM / MTAL | |
Capitalization | 628M | 902M | 70% |
EBITDA | -32.95M | -1.68M | 1,962% |
Gain YTD | -45.180 | -11.864 | 381% |
P/E Ratio | 1250.00 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.32M | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 44.4M | 35.1K | 126,496% |
Total Debt | 496K | 1.46M | 34% |
LZM | MTAL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago48% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago40% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago49% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago45% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago43% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago83% | 17 days ago61% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 3 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago58% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago37% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZM has been loosely correlated with MTAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZM jumps, then MTAL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LZM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LZM | 100% | -4.03% | ||
MTAL - LZM | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
TECK - LZM | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.40% | ||
FCX - LZM | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
HBM - LZM | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
VZLA - LZM | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.61% | ||
More |