MAAS
Price
$3.14
Change
-$0.20 (-5.99%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
2.28B
PTMN
Price
$11.76
Change
+$0.21 (+1.82%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
177.25M
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAAS vs PTMN

Header iconMAAS vs PTMN Comparison
Open Charts MAAS vs PTMNBanner chart's image
Maase
Price$3.14
Change-$0.20 (-5.99%)
Volume$17.04K
Capitalization2.28B
Portman Ridge Finance
Price$11.76
Change+$0.21 (+1.82%)
Volume$38.26K
Capitalization177.25M
MAAS vs PTMN Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PTMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAAS vs. PTMN commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAAS is a Hold and PTMN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (MAAS: $3.14 vs. PTMN: $11.76)
Brand notoriety: MAAS and PTMN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAAS: 22% vs. PTMN: 71%
Market capitalization -- MAAS: $2.28B vs. PTMN: $177.25M
MAAS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.28B. PTMN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $177.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAAS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePTMN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MAAS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PTMN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PTMN is a better buy in the long-term than MAAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAAS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PTMN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAAS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • PTMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PTMN is a better buy in the short-term than MAAS.

Price Growth

MAAS (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.80% price change this week, while PTMN (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAAS is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

PTMN is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.30% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAAS($2.28B) has a higher market cap than PTMN($177M). MAAS YTD gains are higher at: 837.313 vs. PTMN (-22.526).
MAASPTMNMAAS / PTMN
Capitalization2.28B177M1,289%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD837.313-22.526-3,717%
P/E RatioN/A15.81-
RevenueN/A12.7M-
Total CashN/A403K-
Total DebtN/A322M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAAS vs PTMN: Fundamental Ratings
MAAS
PTMN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5076
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10038
SMR RATING
1..100
9239
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3483
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1004
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PTMN's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAAS (62). This means that PTMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PTMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAAS (100). This means that PTMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PTMN's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAAS (92). This means that PTMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAAS’s over the last 12 months.

MAAS's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PTMN (83). This means that MAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PTMN’s over the last 12 months.

PTMN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAAS (100). This means that PTMN’s stock grew significantly faster than MAAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAASPTMN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PTMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ONERX46.320.82
+1.80%
One Rock
SBSPX46.510.48
+1.04%
Franklin S&P 500 Index A
FAMWX104.811.03
+0.99%
FAM Value Institutional
MSFKX19.210.07
+0.37%
MFS Total Return R6
NREMX22.07N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Emerg Mkts Eq R6

MAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAAS and OCCIN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAAS and OCCIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAAS
1D Price
Change %
MAAS100%
-5.99%
OCCIN - MAAS
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
PTMN - MAAS
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
DHIL - MAAS
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
CRBG - MAAS
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
GAIN - MAAS
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
More

PTMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PTMN has been loosely correlated with PFLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PTMN jumps, then PFLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PTMN
1D Price
Change %
PTMN100%
+1.82%
PFLT - PTMN
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
FSK - PTMN
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
NMFC - PTMN
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
ARCC - PTMN
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
CION - PTMN
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
More