Ad is loading...
MACSX vs PNSIX
MACSX vs PNSIX Comparison
Open Charts MACSX vs PNSIX
Matthews Asian Growth & Inc Investor
Price$13.25
Change+$0.09 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.92M
T. Rowe Price New Asia I
Price$16.57
Change+$0.08 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
MACSX vs PNSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MACSX vs. PNSIX commentary
Jan 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MACSX is a Hold and PNSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSIX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. MACSX (246M). MACSX pays higher dividends than PNSIX: MACSX (2.71) vs PNSIX (1.93). MACSX was incepted earlier than PNSIX: MACSX (30 years) vs PNSIX (9 years). PNSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.50 vs. MACSX (12.00). MACSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNSIX: MACSX (2500) vs PNSIX (500000). MACSX (14.13) and PNSIX (14.13) have marching annual gain over last year. MACSX return over 5 years is better than : -9.24 vs. PNSIX (-14.60).
| MACSX | PNSIX | MACSX / PNSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.675 | -0.600 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 246M | 1.81B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 1.93 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.13 | 14.13 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.80 | -17.43 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.24 | -14.60 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...