Ad is loading...
MAFIX vs MBXAX
MAFIX vs MBXAX Comparison
Open Charts MAFIX vs MBXAX
Abbey Capital Multi Asset I
Price$10.48
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets898.86M
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy A
Price$37.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.9B
MAFIX vs MBXAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MAFIX vs. MBXAX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAFIX is a Hold and MBXAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXAX has more cash in the bank: 7.9B vs. MAFIX (899M). MBXAX (1.75) and MAFIX (1.72) have matching dividends . MAFIX was incepted earlier than MBXAX: MAFIX (7 years) vs MBXAX (9 years). MBXAX (2.28) is less costly to investors than MAFIX (1.87). MBXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. MAFIX (0.00). MBXAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MAFIX: MBXAX (2500) vs MAFIX (1000000). MBXAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.99 vs. MAFIX (-13.98). MBXAX return over 5 years is better than : 55.07 vs. MAFIX (16.72).
| MAFIX | MBXAX | MAFIX / MBXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 2.28 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 2.28 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.274 | -3.789 | 271% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 899M | 7.9B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 1.75 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.98 | -3.99 | 350% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.93 | 5.68 | -87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.72 | 55.07 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...