MAG
Price
$15.16
Change
-$0.31 (-2.00%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.12B
38 days until earnings call
MTA
Price
$2.83
Change
-$0.03 (-1.05%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
284.03M
35 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MAG vs MTA

Header iconMAG vs MTA Comparison
Open Charts MAG vs MTABanner chart's image
MAG Silver
Price$15.16
Change-$0.31 (-2.00%)
Volume$7.5K
Capitalization1.12B
Metalla Royalty & Streaming
Price$2.83
Change-$0.03 (-1.05%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization284.03M
MAG vs MTA Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAG vs. MTA commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAG is a Hold and MTA is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (MAG: $15.17 vs. MTA: $2.84)
Brand notoriety: MAG and MTA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAG: 179% vs. MTA: 123%
Market capitalization -- MAG: $1.12B vs. MTA: $284.03M
MAG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.12B. MTA’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $284.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAG is a better buy in the long-term than MTA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MTA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTA is a better buy in the short-term than MAG.

Price Growth

MAG (@Precious Metals) experienced а -8.78% price change this week, while MTA (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAG is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

MTA is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.49% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAG($1.12B) has a higher market cap than MTA($284M). MTA YTD gains are higher at: 13.147 vs. MAG (11.544). MTA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -917K vs. MAG (-13.89M). MAG has more cash in the bank: 68.7M vs. MTA (14.1M). MAG has less debt than MTA: MAG (154K) vs MTA (14.6M). MTA has higher revenues than MAG: MTA (4.6M) vs MAG (0).
MAGMTAMAG / MTA
Capitalization1.12B284M393%
EBITDA-13.89M-917K1,515%
Gain YTD11.54413.14788%
P/E Ratio22.98N/A-
Revenue04.6M-
Total Cash68.7M14.1M487%
Total Debt154K14.6M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAG vs MTA: Fundamental Ratings
MAG
MTA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6670
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58100
SMR RATING
1..100
5691
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4353
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTA's Valuation (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAG (94) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MTA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTA (100) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTA’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's SMR Rating (56) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTA (91) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTA’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MTA (53) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MTA (100) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAGMTA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGVBX23.510.09
+0.38%
American Funds Global Insight 529-C
NVLIX54.90N/A
N/A
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG I
IGVWX49.10N/A
N/A
Voya Global High Dividend Low Vol W
NGRDX27.12N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth R6
HEIIX13.28N/A
N/A
Hennessy Equity and Income Institutional

MAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAG has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAG jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAG
1D Price
Change %
MAG100%
-1.94%
PAAS - MAG
85%
Closely correlated
-5.97%
HL - MAG
81%
Closely correlated
-4.80%
CDE - MAG
80%
Closely correlated
-4.52%
AG - MAG
80%
Closely correlated
-3.74%
SILV - MAG
77%
Closely correlated
N/A
More

MTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTA has been closely correlated with SVM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTA jumps, then SVM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTA
1D Price
Change %
MTA100%
-0.70%
SVM - MTA
78%
Closely correlated
-5.38%
PAAS - MTA
74%
Closely correlated
-5.97%
CDE - MTA
70%
Closely correlated
-4.52%
HL - MTA
70%
Closely correlated
-4.80%
MAG - MTA
69%
Closely correlated
-1.94%
More