Ad is loading...
MAG
Price
$14.90
Change
-$0.30 (-1.97%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
128 days until earnings call
PMNXF
Price
$1.62
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

MAG vs PMNXF

Header iconMAG vs PMNXF Comparison
Open Charts MAG vs PMNXFBanner chart's image
MAG Silver
Price$14.90
Change-$0.30 (-1.97%)
Volume$1.34M
CapitalizationN/A
Perseus Mining
Price$1.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.65K
CapitalizationN/A
MAG vs PMNXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAG vs. PMNXF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAG is a StrongSell and PMNXF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MAG: $14.90 vs. PMNXF: $1.62)
Brand notoriety: MAG and PMNXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAG: 173% vs. PMNXF: 39%
Market capitalization -- MAG: $1.12B vs. PMNXF: $1.62B
MAG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.12B. PMNXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePMNXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PMNXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMNXF is a better buy in the long-term than MAG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MAG (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.17% price change this week, while PMNXF (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAG is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMNXF($1.62B) has a higher market cap than MAG($1.12B). MAG has higher P/E ratio than PMNXF: MAG (22.98) vs PMNXF (7.82). MAG YTD gains are higher at: 43.132 vs. PMNXF (27.402). PMNXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 634M vs. MAG (-13.89M). PMNXF has more cash in the bank: 218M vs. MAG (68.7M). MAG has less debt than PMNXF: MAG (154K) vs PMNXF (219M). PMNXF has higher revenues than MAG: PMNXF (1.25B) vs MAG (0).
MAGPMNXFMAG / PMNXF
Capitalization1.12B1.62B69%
EBITDA-13.89M634M-2%
Gain YTD43.13227.402157%
P/E Ratio22.987.82294%
Revenue01.25B-
Total Cash68.7M218M32%
Total Debt154K219M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAG vs PMNXF: Fundamental Ratings
MAG
PMNXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6618
SMR RATING
1..100
6047
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9163
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PMNXF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAG (94) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PMNXF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAG’s over the last 12 months.

PMNXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAG (66) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PMNXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAG’s over the last 12 months.

PMNXF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MAG (60) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PMNXF’s stock grew similarly to MAG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PMNXF (56) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to PMNXF’s over the last 12 months.

PMNXF's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as MAG (91) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PMNXF’s stock grew similarly to MAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JIVMX33.62-0.17
-0.50%
JPMorgan U.S. Applied Data Sci Val R6
GBCCX16.40-0.12
-0.73%
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
BPSIX29.96-0.36
-1.19%
Boston Partners Small Cap Value II I
JSGIX29.07-0.59
-1.99%
JHancock U.S. Growth I
FADTX124.31-2.97
-2.33%
Fidelity Advisor Technology A

PMNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMNXF has been loosely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMNXF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMNXF
1D Price
Change %
PMNXF100%
N/A
AEM - PMNXF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
CDE - PMNXF
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
MAG - PMNXF
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
NGD - PMNXF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
BTG - PMNXF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
More