MAG
Price
$14.57
Change
-$0.17 (-1.15%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
7 days until earnings call
XTGRF
Price
$1.40
Change
-$0.09 (-6.04%)
Updated
May 1 closing price
Capitalization
29.78M
Ad is loading...

MAG vs XTGRF

Header iconMAG vs XTGRF Comparison
Open Charts MAG vs XTGRFBanner chart's image
MAG Silver
Price$14.57
Change-$0.17 (-1.15%)
Volume$506.97K
Capitalization1.12B
Xtra-Gold Resources
Price$1.40
Change-$0.09 (-6.04%)
Volume$16.92K
Capitalization29.78M
MAG vs XTGRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAG vs. XTGRF commentary
May 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAG is a Buy and XTGRF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 05, 2025
Stock price -- (MAG: $14.57 vs. XTGRF: $1.40)
Brand notoriety: MAG and XTGRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAG: 70% vs. XTGRF: 159%
Market capitalization -- MAG: $1.12B vs. XTGRF: $29.78M
MAG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.12B. XTGRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $29.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXTGRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XTGRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, XTGRF is a better buy in the long-term than MAG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MAG (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.88% price change this week, while XTGRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAG is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.42% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAG($1.12B) has a higher market cap than XTGRF($29.8M). XTGRF has higher P/E ratio than MAG: XTGRF (63.29) vs MAG (22.98). MAG YTD gains are higher at: 8.419 vs. XTGRF (3.704). XTGRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.51M vs. MAG (-13.89M). MAG has more cash in the bank: 68.7M vs. XTGRF (10.5M). MAG (0) and XTGRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
MAGXTGRFMAG / XTGRF
Capitalization1.12B29.8M3,745%
EBITDA-13.89M-1.51M921%
Gain YTD8.4193.704227%
P/E Ratio22.9863.2936%
Revenue00-
Total Cash68.7M10.5M654%
Total Debt154KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAG vs XTGRF: Fundamental Ratings
MAG
XTGRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6622
SMR RATING
1..100
10081
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8026
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAG's Valuation (85) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as XTGRF (93) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to XTGRF’s over the last 12 months.

XTGRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAG (66) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that XTGRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAG’s over the last 12 months.

XTGRF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as MAG (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that XTGRF’s stock grew similarly to MAG’s over the last 12 months.

XTGRF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as MAG (58) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that XTGRF’s stock grew similarly to MAG’s over the last 12 months.

XTGRF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAG (80) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that XTGRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UYG86.833.67
+4.41%
ProShares Ultra Financials
FINX28.600.37
+1.31%
Global X FinTech ETF
SCHH21.320.24
+1.14%
Schwab US REIT ETF™
NUHY21.050.05
+0.26%
Nuveen ESG High Yield Corporate Bd ETF
PSCD88.26N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discret ETF

XTGRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XTGRF and RNDXF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XTGRF and RNDXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XTGRF
1D Price
Change %
XTGRF100%
N/A
RNDXF - XTGRF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EGO - XTGRF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
EQX - XTGRF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
GOLD - XTGRF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
MAG - XTGRF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
More