MAIN
Price
$52.04
Change
-$3.89 (-6.96%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:35 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.02B
27 days until earnings call
NMFC
Price
$10.01
Change
-$0.69 (-6.45%)
Updated
Apr 4, 02:46 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.34B
38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MAIN vs NMFC

Header iconMAIN vs NMFC Comparison
Open Charts MAIN vs NMFCBanner chart's image
Main Street Capital
Price$52.04
Change-$3.89 (-6.96%)
Volume$500
Capitalization4.02B
New Mountain Finance
Price$10.01
Change-$0.69 (-6.45%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.34B
MAIN vs NMFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAIN vs. NMFC commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAIN is a Hold and NMFC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (MAIN: $55.93 vs. NMFC: $10.70)
Brand notoriety: MAIN and NMFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAIN: 95% vs. NMFC: 226%
Market capitalization -- MAIN: $4.02B vs. NMFC: $1.34B
MAIN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.02B. NMFC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNMFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MAIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NMFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the long-term than NMFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • NMFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMFC is a better buy in the short-term than MAIN.

Price Growth

MAIN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.68% price change this week, while NMFC (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAIN is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

NMFC is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.81% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($4.02B) has a higher market cap than NMFC($1.34B). NMFC has higher P/E ratio than MAIN: NMFC (10.15) vs MAIN (8.97). NMFC YTD gains are higher at: -2.168 vs. MAIN (-2.794). NMFC (1.79B) and MAIN (1.8B) have identical debt. MAIN has higher revenues than NMFC: MAIN (510M) vs NMFC (144M).
MAINNMFCMAIN / NMFC
Capitalization4.02B1.34B301%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.794-2.168129%
P/E Ratio8.9710.1588%
Revenue510M144M354%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.8B1.79B101%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAIN vs NMFC: Fundamental Ratings
MAIN
NMFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6970
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
730
SMR RATING
1..100
1327
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4771
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3941
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5015

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMFC's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAIN (40). This means that NMFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (30). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (27). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (71). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (41). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAINNMFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MZZ11.991.40
+13.23%
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
EWW54.262.10
+4.03%
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
HYEM19.41-0.19
-0.97%
VanEck EM High Yield Bond ETF
JANT34.18-1.21
-3.41%
AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF
CUBA2.54-0.10
-3.79%
Herzfeld Caribbean Basin Fund

NMFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMFC has been loosely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMFC jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMFC
1D Price
Change %
NMFC100%
-2.37%
MAIN - NMFC
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.68%
FSK - NMFC
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
TSLX - NMFC
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.59%
ARCC - NMFC
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.97%
SLRC - NMFC
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
More