MAIN
Price
$60.04
Change
-$0.44 (-0.73%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.02B
32 days until earnings call
OFS
Price
$8.05
Change
-$0.02 (-0.25%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
133.04M
41 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MAIN vs OFS

Header iconMAIN vs OFS Comparison
Open Charts MAIN vs OFSBanner chart's image
Main Street Capital
Price$60.04
Change-$0.44 (-0.73%)
Volume$765.67K
Capitalization4.02B
OFS Capital
Price$8.05
Change-$0.02 (-0.25%)
Volume$28.72K
Capitalization133.04M
MAIN vs OFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAIN vs. OFS commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAIN is a Hold and OFS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (MAIN: $60.04 vs. OFS: $8.05)
Brand notoriety: MAIN and OFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAIN: 166% vs. OFS: 48%
Market capitalization -- MAIN: $4.02B vs. OFS: $133.04M
MAIN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.02B. OFS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $133.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MAIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the long-term than OFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MAIN and OFS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MAIN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.02% price change this week, while OFS (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAIN is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

OFS is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.49% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($4.02B) has a higher market cap than OFS($133M). OFS has higher P/E ratio than MAIN: OFS (23.43) vs MAIN (8.97). MAIN YTD gains are higher at: 2.933 vs. OFS (-0.248). OFS has less debt than MAIN: OFS (300M) vs MAIN (1.8B). MAIN has higher revenues than OFS: MAIN (510M) vs OFS (4.79M).
MAINOFSMAIN / OFS
Capitalization4.02B133M3,023%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.933-0.248-1,184%
P/E Ratio8.9723.4338%
Revenue510M4.79M10,645%
Total CashN/A15.9M-
Total Debt1.8B300M601%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAIN vs OFS: Fundamental Ratings
MAIN
OFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4656
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1957
SMR RATING
1..100
1383
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3551
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
25n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OFS's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAIN (61). This means that OFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OFS (57). This means that MAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than OFS’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OFS (83). This means that MAIN’s stock grew significantly faster than OFS’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as OFS (59). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to OFS’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as OFS (51). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to OFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAINOFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
35%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
56%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GVXXF0.03N/A
+2.52%
Goviex Uranium Inc
LNVGY23.990.20
+0.84%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
LAMYX23.410.17
+0.73%
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth I
LMCPX33.580.11
+0.33%
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock P
SUBCY17.16-0.14
-0.81%
Subsea 7 S.A.

OFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OFS has been loosely correlated with NXDT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OFS jumps, then NXDT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OFS
1D Price
Change %
OFS100%
-0.25%
NXDT - OFS
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
NEWT - OFS
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
MAIN - OFS
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
ARCC - OFS
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
FSK - OFS
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
More