MAIN
Price
$51.74
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
104 days until earnings call
WHF
Price
$11.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
111 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MAIN vs WHF

Header iconMAIN vs WHF Comparison
Open Charts MAIN vs WHFBanner chart's image
Main Street Capital
Price$51.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$406.5K
CapitalizationN/A
WhiteHorse Finance
Price$11.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$78.9K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MAIN vs WHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
MAIN vs. WHF commentary
Nov 09, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAIN is a Buy and WHF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 09, 2024
Stock price -- (MAIN: $51.74 vs. WHF: $11.60)
Brand notoriety: MAIN and WHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAIN: 118% vs. WHF: 108%
Market capitalization -- MAIN: $4.02B vs. WHF: $283.1M
MAIN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.02B. WHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $283.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MAIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHF is a better buy in the long-term than MAIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MAIN and WHF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MAIN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.78% price change this week, while WHF (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

WHF is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.10% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($4.02B) has a higher market cap than WHF($283M). WHF has higher P/E ratio than MAIN: WHF (13.84) vs MAIN (8.97). MAIN YTD gains are higher at: 28.222 vs. WHF (5.585). WHF has less debt than MAIN: WHF (386M) vs MAIN (1.8B). MAIN has higher revenues than WHF: MAIN (510M) vs WHF (25.7M).
MAINWHFMAIN / WHF
Capitalization4.02B283M1,421%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.2225.585505%
P/E Ratio8.9713.8465%
Revenue510M25.7M1,984%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.8B386M467%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAIN vs WHF: Fundamental Ratings
MAIN
WHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8172
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2936
SMR RATING
1..100
1350
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4740
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAIN (76). This means that WHF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as WHF (36). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to WHF’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WHF (50). This means that MAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than WHF’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as WHF (51). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to WHF’s over the last 12 months.

WHF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (47). This means that WHF’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAINWHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PJFOX73.241.01
+1.40%
PGIM Jennison Growth R2
VALIX12.700.13
+1.03%
Value Line Capital Appreciation Investor
RGABX73.110.69
+0.95%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
FZAMX26.650.02
+0.08%
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
FNPIX40.42N/A
N/A
ProFunds Financials UltraSector Inv

WHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHF has been loosely correlated with NXDT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHF jumps, then NXDT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHF
1D Price
Change %
WHF100%
-0.85%
NXDT - WHF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
NEWT - WHF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.53%
MAIN - WHF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
CGBD - WHF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
FDUS - WHF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
More