Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MAMAX vs RLBFX
MAMAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MAMAX vs RLBFX
MFS Moderate Allocation A
Price$20.40
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.32B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$36.57
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.05B
MAMAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MAMAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAMAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 250B vs. MAMAX (6.32B). MAMAX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MAMAX (2.42) vs RLBFX (2.18). MAMAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MAMAX (23 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MAMAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MAMAX (4.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MAMAX: RLBFX (250) vs MAMAX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.90 vs. MAMAX (5.80). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.86 vs. MAMAX (25.71).
| MAMAX | RLBFX | MAMAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.29 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.29 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.853 | 7.138 | 96% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 250B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 2.18 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | 7.90 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.47 | 35.14 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.71 | 44.86 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.38 | 67.01 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement