Ad is loading...
MANDF
Price
$4.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
NETD
Price
$10.72
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

MANDF vs NETD

Header iconMANDF vs NETD Comparison
Open Charts MANDF vs NETDBanner chart's image
MANDATUM OYJ
Price$4.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Nabors Energy Transition
Price$10.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$153.15K
CapitalizationN/A
MANDF vs NETD Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MANDF vs. NETD commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MANDF is a Buy and NETD is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MANDF: $4.40 vs. NETD: $10.72)
Brand notoriety: MANDF and NETD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MANDF: 41% vs. NETD: 317%
Market capitalization -- MANDF: $2.22B vs. NETD: $396.5M
MANDF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $2.22B. NETD’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $396.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MANDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNETD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MANDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NETD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MANDF is a better buy in the long-term than NETD.

Price Growth

MANDF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NETD (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.64% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MANDF($2.22B) has a higher market cap than NETD($396M). NETD YTD gains are higher at: 3.077 vs. MANDF (0.000). MANDF has more cash in the bank: 789M vs. NETD (2.02M). NETD has less debt than MANDF: NETD (3.05M) vs MANDF (250M).
MANDFNETDMANDF / NETD
Capitalization2.22B396M562%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.0003.077-
P/E Ratio12.98N/A-
Revenue1.42BN/A-
Total Cash789M2.02M39,059%
Total Debt250M3.05M8,197%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSIKX17.88-0.06
-0.33%
Goldman Sachs International Eq Inc Instl
EXOSX32.28-0.40
-1.22%
Manning & Napier Overseas Series I
MITCX37.33-0.46
-1.22%
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr C
VYSZX7.71-0.11
-1.41%
Voya Small Company C
EFCCX18.83-0.52
-2.69%
Emerald Insights C

MANDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MANDF has been loosely correlated with KACLU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MANDF jumps, then KACLU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MANDF
1D Price
Change %
MANDF100%
N/A
KACLU - MANDF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GBBK - MANDF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
NETD - MANDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MARXU - MANDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPXX - MANDF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
More

NETD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NETD and MANDF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NETD and MANDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NETD
1D Price
Change %
NETD100%
N/A
MANDF - NETD
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLACU - NETD
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
BOWN - NETD
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
OAKU - NETD
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AACT - NETD
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
More