MANDF
Price
$5.63
Change
-$0.37 (-6.17%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.2B
PORTU
Price
$10.75
Change
+$0.24 (+2.28%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

MANDF vs PORTU

Header iconMANDF vs PORTU Comparison
Open Charts MANDF vs PORTUBanner chart's image
MANDATUM OYJ
Price$5.63
Change-$0.37 (-6.17%)
Volume$1.42K
Capitalization3.2B
Southport Acquisition
Price$10.75
Change+$0.24 (+2.28%)
Volume$842
CapitalizationN/A
MANDF vs PORTU Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MANDF vs. PORTU commentary
Jun 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MANDF is a Hold and PORTU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2025
Stock price -- (MANDF: $5.63 vs. PORTU: $10.75)
Brand notoriety: MANDF and PORTU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MANDF: 302% vs. PORTU: 100%
Market capitalization -- MANDF: $3.2B vs. PORTU: $0
MANDF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $3.2B. PORTU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MANDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePORTU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MANDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PORTU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MANDF is a better buy in the long-term than PORTU.

Price Growth

MANDF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PORTU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

PORTU is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.01% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MANDF YTD gains are higher at: 25.111 vs. PORTU (0.000).
MANDFPORTUMANDF / PORTU
Capitalization3.2BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.1110.000-
P/E Ratio13.98N/A-
Revenue893MN/A-
Total Cash830MN/A-
Total Debt600MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BMCIX28.46N/A
N/A
BlackRock High Equity Income Instl
FVLKX13.43N/A
N/A
Fidelity Value K
RSERX22.68N/A
N/A
Victory Sophus Emerging Markets R6
DSCIX13.44N/A
N/A
Dana Epiphany Small Cap Eq Instl
VTAIX11.17N/A
N/A
Virtus Tactical Allocation I

MANDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MANDF and NETD have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MANDF and NETD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MANDF
1D Price
Change %
MANDF100%
N/A
NETD - MANDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
BOWN - MANDF
10%
Poorly correlated
-4.67%
KVAC - MANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
RTGC - MANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSTUF - MANDF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PORTU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PORTU and SPKLU have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PORTU and SPKLU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PORTU
1D Price
Change %
PORTU100%
N/A
SPKLU - PORTU
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KVAC - PORTU
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
MANDF - PORTU
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QETAU - PORTU
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
CSTUF - PORTU
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More