Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MAPCX vs RNWHX
MAPCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MAPCX vs RNWHX
BlackRock Sustainable Em Mkts Eq Ins
Price$14.61
Change+$0.05 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.5M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$84.70
Change+$0.33 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.26B
MAPCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MAPCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAPCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 67.3B vs. MAPCX (76.5M). MAPCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MAPCX (2.50) vs RNWHX (1.04). MAPCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MAPCX (49 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MAPCX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MAPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MAPCX: RNWHX (250) vs MAPCX (2000000). MAPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.52 vs. RNWHX (7.22). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.50 vs. MAPCX (0.87).
| MAPCX | RNWHX | MAPCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.72 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.72 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 49 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.259 | 10.984 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.5M | 67.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 1.04 | 240% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.52 | 7.22 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.88 | 30.45 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.87 | 29.50 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement