Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MAPCX vs RNWHX
MAPCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MAPCX vs RNWHX
BlackRock Sustainable Em Mkts Eq Ins
Price$15.20
Change+$0.11 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.62M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.01
Change+$0.17 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.94B
MAPCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MAPCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAPCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 69.9B vs. MAPCX (78.6M). MAPCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MAPCX (2.33) vs RNWHX (0.99). MAPCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MAPCX (49 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MAPCX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MAPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MAPCX: RNWHX (250) vs MAPCX (2000000). MAPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.18 vs. RNWHX (9.21). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.76 vs. MAPCX (0.24).
| MAPCX | RNWHX | MAPCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.72 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.72 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 49 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.345 | 15.772 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.6M | 69.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.33 | 0.99 | 236% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.18 | 9.21 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.25 | 40.65 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.24 | 29.76 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.05 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement