MAPS vs MJUS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAPS is a Hold and MJUS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAPS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- MAPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAPS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MAPS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
MAPS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.72% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
MAPS is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-2.81% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| MAPS | MJUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 28 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 28 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 84% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
MAPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAPS has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAPS jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAPS | 100% | -4.14% | ||
| COIN - MAPS | 48% Loosely correlated | -8.27% | ||
| COMP - MAPS | 47% Loosely correlated | -8.18% | ||
| RIOT - MAPS | 42% Loosely correlated | -9.83% | ||
| CLSK - MAPS | 39% Loosely correlated | -8.05% | ||
| SBIG - MAPS | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MJUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MJUS has been loosely correlated with GRWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MJUS jumps, then GRWG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MJUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MJUS | 100% | N/A | ||
| GRWG - MJUS | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.60% | ||
| MAPS - MJUS | 46% Loosely correlated | -4.14% | ||
| IIPR - MJUS | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| HYFM - MJUS | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
| FLGC - MJUS | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.26% | ||
More | ||||