MARK
Price
$0.42
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 13, 6:59 PM EST
TRUG
Price
$1.37
Change
+$0.07 (+5.38%)
Updated
May 17, 6:59 PM EST
Ad is loading...

MARK vs TRUG

Header iconMARK vs TRUG Comparison
Open Charts MARK vs TRUGBanner chart's image
Remark Holdings
Price$0.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.3M
CapitalizationN/A
TruGolf Holdings
Price$1.37
Change+$0.07 (+5.38%)
Volume$22.18K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MARK vs TRUG Comparison Chart

Loading...

MARKDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
MARK vs. TRUG commentary
May 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MARK is a Hold and TRUG is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 19, 2024
Stock price -- (MARK: $0.17 vs. TRUG: $1.37)
Brand notoriety: MARK and TRUG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MARK: 1381% vs. TRUG: 2%
Market capitalization -- MARK: $18.4M vs. TRUG: $16.97M
MARK [@Packaged Software] is valued at $18.4M. TRUG’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $16.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MARK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRUG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MARK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRUG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MARK is a better buy in the long-term than TRUG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MARK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MARK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

MARK (@Packaged Software) experienced а +48.72% price change this week, while TRUG (@Packaged Software) price change was -6.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

MARK is expected to report earnings on Mar 30, 2023.

TRUG is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.46% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for MARK with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for TRUG with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MARK($18.4M) has a higher market cap than TRUG($17M). MARK YTD gains are higher at: -64.863 vs. TRUG (-88.240). MARK has more cash in the bank: 208K vs. TRUG (178K). TRUG has less debt than MARK: TRUG (2.15M) vs MARK (17.3M).
MARKTRUGMARK / TRUG
Capitalization18.4M17M108%
EBITDA-26.9MN/A-
Gain YTD-64.863-88.24074%
P/E Ratio5.95N/A-
Revenue8.43MN/A-
Total Cash208K178K117%
Total Debt17.3M2.15M805%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MARK: Fundamental Ratings
MARK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MARK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MARKDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGI17.090.81
+4.98%
Alamos Gold
BMBL12.300.17
+1.40%
Bumble
SLB48.590.17
+0.35%
Schlumberger Limited
KTCC4.380.01
+0.23%
Key Tronic Corp
LE14.03-0.04
-0.28%
Lands' End

TRUG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRUG has been loosely correlated with RTC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRUG jumps, then RTC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRUG
1D Price
Change %
TRUG100%
+5.38%
RTC - TRUG
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
CALX - TRUG
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
MARK - TRUG
33%
Poorly correlated
+45.00%
CMAX - TRUG
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.33%
NUKKW - TRUG
11%
Poorly correlated
-14.00%
More