MAT
Price
$16.45
Change
-$0.13 (-0.78%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.81B
16 days until earnings call
PII
Price
$36.71
Change
+$0.57 (+1.58%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
5.65B
22 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MAT vs PII

Header iconMAT vs PII Comparison
Open Charts MAT vs PIIBanner chart's image
Mattel
Price$16.45
Change-$0.13 (-0.78%)
Volume$10.12M
Capitalization6.81B
Polaris
Price$36.71
Change+$0.57 (+1.58%)
Volume$2.89M
Capitalization5.65B
MAT vs PII Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAT vs. PII commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAT is a StrongBuy and PII is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MAT: $16.45 vs. PII: $36.71)
Brand notoriety: MAT and PII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAT: 225% vs. PII: 161%
Market capitalization -- MAT: $6.81B vs. PII: $5.65B
MAT [@Recreational Products] is valued at $6.81B. PII’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $5.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePII’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PII’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MAT and PII are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PII’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PII’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PII is a better buy in the short-term than MAT.

Price Growth

MAT (@Recreational Products) experienced а -14.77% price change this week, while PII (@Recreational Products) price change was -11.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -6.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAT is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

PII is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-6.63% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAT($6.82B) has a higher market cap than PII($5.66B). MAT has higher P/E ratio than PII: MAT (32.81) vs PII (11.36). MAT YTD gains are higher at: -7.219 vs. PII (-35.325). PII has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1B vs. MAT (767M). MAT has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. PII (368M). PII has less debt than MAT: PII (2.05B) vs MAT (2.59B). PII has higher revenues than MAT: PII (8.93B) vs MAT (5.44B).
MATPIIMAT / PII
Capitalization6.82B5.66B121%
EBITDA767M1B76%
Gain YTD-7.219-35.32520%
P/E Ratio32.8111.36289%
Revenue5.44B8.93B61%
Total Cash1.26B368M343%
Total Debt2.59B2.05B126%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAT vs PII: Fundamental Ratings
MAT
PII
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45100
SMR RATING
1..100
3975
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7889
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
979
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PII's Valuation (9) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAT (79). This means that PII’s stock grew significantly faster than MAT’s over the last 12 months.

MAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PII (100). This means that MAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PII’s over the last 12 months.

MAT's SMR Rating (39) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PII (75). This means that MAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PII’s over the last 12 months.

MAT's Price Growth Rating (78) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as PII (89). This means that MAT’s stock grew similarly to PII’s over the last 12 months.

PII's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAT (97). This means that PII’s stock grew significantly faster than MAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MATPII
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAPR37.72-1.81
-4.57%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Apr
RWL91.01-5.07
-5.28%
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
SUPP53.12-3.21
-5.70%
TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF
REMX34.66-2.90
-7.72%
VanEck Rare Earth & Strat Mtls ETF
CEE12.25-1.06
-7.96%
Central and Eastern Europe Fund (The)

MAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAT has been loosely correlated with HAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAT jumps, then HAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAT
1D Price
Change %
MAT100%
-0.78%
HAS - MAT
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
JAKK - MAT
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.93%
GOLF - MAT
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
BC - MAT
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
PII - MAT
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
More