Ad is loading...
MATFX vs TRZNX
MATFX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts MATFX vs TRZNX
Matthews Asia Innovators Investor
Price$12.17
Change+$0.66 (+5.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.73M
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
Price$15.67
Change+$0.76 (+5.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
MATFX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. MATFX (252M). TRZNX pays higher dividends than MATFX: TRZNX (2.26) vs MATFX (0.00). MATFX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: MATFX (25 years) vs TRZNX (4 years). MATFX (1.15) is less costly to investors than TRZNX (0.83). MATFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 248.19 vs. TRZNX (54.80). TRZNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MATFX: TRZNX (0) vs MATFX (2500). MATFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.64 vs. TRZNX (-5.25).
| MATFX | TRZNX | MATFX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.83 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.051 | -9.855 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252M | 1.6B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.26 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.64 | -5.25 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.33 | -11.00 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.73 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.98 | N/A | - |