MBCN
Price
$24.57
Change
-$0.43 (-1.72%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
192.69M
72 days until earnings call
SBCF
Price
$28.17
Change
-$0.97 (-3.33%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.1B
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MBCN vs SBCF

Header iconMBCN vs SBCF Comparison
Open Charts MBCN vs SBCFBanner chart's image
Middlefield Banc
Price$24.57
Change-$0.43 (-1.72%)
Volume$10.52K
Capitalization192.69M
Seacoast Banking
Price$28.17
Change-$0.97 (-3.33%)
Volume$371.17K
Capitalization2.1B
MBCN vs SBCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MBCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBCN vs. SBCF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBCN is a Hold and SBCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (MBCN: $24.57 vs. SBCF: $28.17)
Brand notoriety: MBCN and SBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBCN: 106% vs. SBCF: 94%
Market capitalization -- MBCN: $192.69M vs. SBCF: $2.1B
MBCN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $192.69M. SBCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBCN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBCN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBCN is a better buy in the long-term than SBCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBCN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBCN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SBCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBCN is a better buy in the short-term than SBCF.

Price Growth

MBCN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -8.42% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBCN is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBCF($2.1B) has a higher market cap than MBCN($193M). SBCF has higher P/E ratio than MBCN: SBCF (20.13) vs MBCN (11.34). SBCF YTD gains are higher at: 2.325 vs. MBCN (-12.406). SBCF has more cash in the bank: 168M vs. MBCN (56.2M). SBCF has less debt than MBCN: SBCF (156M) vs MBCN (175M). SBCF has higher revenues than MBCN: SBCF (567M) vs MBCN (71.9M).
MBCNSBCFMBCN / SBCF
Capitalization193M2.1B9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.4062.325-534%
P/E Ratio11.3420.1356%
Revenue71.9M567M13%
Total Cash56.2M168M33%
Total Debt175M156M112%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBCN vs SBCF: Fundamental Ratings
MBCN
SBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8428
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7784
SMR RATING
1..100
4913
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6150
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3549
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBCN's Valuation (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (78). This means that MBCN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

MBCN's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (84). This means that MBCN’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBCN (49). This means that SBCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBCN’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBCN (61). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to MBCN’s over the last 12 months.

MBCN's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (49). This means that MBCN’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBCNSBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MBCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EIHSX14.29-0.02
-0.14%
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sci I
RNGEX62.35-1.34
-2.10%
American Funds New Economy R4
BRSSX14.32-0.35
-2.39%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq R2
MIIOX26.44-0.68
-2.51%
Marsico International Opportunities Inst
JSCRX18.86-0.52
-2.68%
PGIM Jennison Small Company R

MBCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBCN has been loosely correlated with PPBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBCN jumps, then PPBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBCN
1D Price
Change %
MBCN100%
-1.72%
PPBI - MBCN
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.70%
SBCF - MBCN
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.33%
BFC - MBCN
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
CNOB - MBCN
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
FDBC - MBCN
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
More

SBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBCF has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBCF jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBCF
1D Price
Change %
SBCF100%
-3.33%
ABCB - SBCF
91%
Closely correlated
-2.13%
WSFS - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
PPBI - SBCF
89%
Closely correlated
-2.70%
UCB - SBCF
89%
Closely correlated
-2.09%
SFNC - SBCF
89%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
More