MBIN
Price
$31.44
Change
+$1.38 (+4.59%)
Updated
May 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.87B
77 days until earnings call
PNFP
Price
$107.53
Change
+$2.85 (+2.72%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
6.62B
74 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MBIN vs PNFP

Header iconMBIN vs PNFP Comparison
Open Charts MBIN vs PNFPBanner chart's image
Merchants Ban
Price$31.44
Change+$1.38 (+4.59%)
Volume$2.25K
Capitalization1.87B
Pinnacle Financial Partners
Price$107.53
Change+$2.85 (+2.72%)
Volume$552.49K
Capitalization6.62B
MBIN vs PNFP Comparison Chart
Loading...
MBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBIN vs. PNFP commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBIN is a Buy and PNFP is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (MBIN: $31.47 vs. PNFP: $107.53)
Brand notoriety: MBIN and PNFP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBIN: 95% vs. PNFP: 89%
Market capitalization -- MBIN: $1.87B vs. PNFP: $6.62B
MBIN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.87B. PNFP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePNFP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MBIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PNFP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNFP is a better buy in the long-term than MBIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNFP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PNFP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBIN is a better buy in the short-term than PNFP.

Price Growth

MBIN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.44% price change this week, while PNFP (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

PNFP is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNFP($6.62B) has a higher market cap than MBIN($1.87B). PNFP has higher P/E ratio than MBIN: PNFP (11.70) vs MBIN (7.50). PNFP YTD gains are higher at: -5.597 vs. MBIN (-17.350). PNFP has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. MBIN (10.6M). MBIN has less debt than PNFP: MBIN (964M) vs PNFP (2.56B). PNFP has higher revenues than MBIN: PNFP (1.38B) vs MBIN (559M).
MBINPNFPMBIN / PNFP
Capitalization1.87B6.62B28%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-17.350-5.597310%
P/E Ratio7.5011.7064%
Revenue559M1.38B40%
Total Cash10.6M229M5%
Total Debt964M2.56B38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBIN vs PNFP: Fundamental Ratings
MBIN
PNFP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
823
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4036
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7416
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBIN's Valuation (25) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNFP (81). This means that MBIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBIN (40). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBIN (9). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBIN (85). This means that PNFP’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBIN (74). This means that PNFP’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBINPNFP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSCJX21.660.11
+0.51%
PGIM Jennison Small Company R4
VCRQX14.220.02
+0.14%
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Class R6
FOBAX19.410.01
+0.05%
Tributary Balanced Instl
DIISX21.65N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon International Stock Index Inv
PREIX147.51N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500

MBIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBIN has been loosely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBIN jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBIN
1D Price
Change %
MBIN100%
-1.92%
BY - MBIN
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
RNST - MBIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
FLIC - MBIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
HWC - MBIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
ABCB - MBIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
More