Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBXFX vs RDMAX
MBXFX vs RDMAX Comparison
Open Charts MBXFX vs RDMAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy C-1
Price$37.09
Change-$0.09 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.22B
Return Stacked Bal Allc & Sys Macro A
Price$19.21
Change+$0.18 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44M
MBXFX vs RDMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXFX has more cash in the bank: 8.22B vs. RDMAX (41.4M). RDMAX pays higher dividends than MBXFX: RDMAX (4.58) vs MBXFX (1.17). MBXFX was incepted earlier than RDMAX: MBXFX (5 years) vs RDMAX (9 years). MBXFX (3.03) is less costly to investors than RDMAX (2.54). MBXFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RDMAX (0.00). RDMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBXFX: RDMAX (1000) vs MBXFX (2500). MBXFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.31 vs. RDMAX (-7.08).
| MBXFX | RDMAX | MBXFX / RDMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.03 | 2.26 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.03 | 2.54 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.027 | -5.323 | 1% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.22B | 41.4M | 19,848% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 4.58 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.31 | -7.08 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.23 | -17.83 | -74% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 8.74 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement