Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBXIX vs RDMAX
MBXIX vs RDMAX Comparison
Open Charts MBXIX vs RDMAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy I
Price$38.89
Change-$0.09 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.22B
Return Stacked Bal Allc & Sys Macro A
Price$19.21
Change+$0.18 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44M
MBXIX vs RDMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBXIX vs. RDMAX commentary
Jun 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBXIX is a Buy and RDMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXIX has more cash in the bank: 8.22B vs. RDMAX (41.4M). RDMAX pays higher dividends than MBXIX: RDMAX (4.58) vs MBXIX (1.92). MBXIX was incepted earlier than RDMAX: MBXIX (9 years) vs RDMAX (9 years). RDMAX (2.54) is less costly to investors than MBXIX (2.03). MBXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RDMAX (0.00). RDMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBXIX: RDMAX (1000) vs MBXIX (2500). MBXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.51 vs. RDMAX (-7.08). MBXIX return over 5 years is better than : 58.02 vs. RDMAX (8.74).
| MBXIX | RDMAX | MBXIX / RDMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 2.26 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 2.54 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.103 | -5.323 | -2% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.22B | 41.4M | 19,848% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 4.58 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.51 | -7.08 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.50 | -17.83 | -93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.02 | 8.74 | 664% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement