MC
Price
$75.02
Change
+$0.62 (+0.83%)
Updated
Dec 18, 10:32 AM (EDT)
49 days until earnings call
TREE
Price
$40.42
Change
-$0.04 (-0.10%)
Updated
Dec 18, 11:03 AM (EDT)
76 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MC vs TREE

Header iconMC vs TREE Comparison
Open Charts MC vs TREEBanner chart's image
Moelis & Company
Price$75.02
Change+$0.62 (+0.83%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
LendingTree
Price$40.42
Change-$0.04 (-0.10%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
MC vs TREE Comparison Chart
Loading...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TREE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MC vs. TREE commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MC is a Buy and TREE is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MC: $74.40 vs. TREE: $40.46)
Brand notoriety: MC and TREE are both not notable
MC represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while TREE is part of the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MC: 107% vs. TREE: 75%
Market capitalization -- MC: $3.79B vs. TREE: $540.63M
MC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.79B. TREE’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $540.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTREE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TREE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MC is a better buy in the long-term than TREE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TREE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TREE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TREE is a better buy in the short-term than MC.

Price Growth

MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.05% price change this week, while TREE (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -2.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.29%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

MC is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

TREE is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.18% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.22% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MC($3.79B) has a higher market cap than TREE($541M). MC YTD gains are higher at: 38.102 vs. TREE (33.443). TREE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 55.7M vs. MC (-32.04M). MC has more cash in the bank: 186M vs. TREE (96.8M). MC has less debt than TREE: MC (216M) vs TREE (549M). MC has higher revenues than TREE: MC (855M) vs TREE (773M).
MCTREEMC / TREE
Capitalization3.79B541M700%
EBITDA-32.04M55.7M-58%
Gain YTD38.10233.443114%
P/E Ratio82.58N/A-
Revenue855M773M111%
Total Cash186M96.8M192%
Total Debt216M549M39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MC vs TREE: Fundamental Ratings
MC
TREE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
66
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20100
SMR RATING
1..100
6496
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4262
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MC's Valuation (25) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for TREE (96) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that MC’s stock grew significantly faster than TREE’s over the last 12 months.

MC's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for TREE (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that MC’s stock grew significantly faster than TREE’s over the last 12 months.

MC's SMR Rating (64) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as TREE (96) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to TREE’s over the last 12 months.

MC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as TREE (62) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to TREE’s over the last 12 months.

MC's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as TREE (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to TREE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCTREE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TREE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSGSX47.27N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Equity Income Svc
MADCX24.29-0.03
-0.12%
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Instl
IYEFX8.92-0.04
-0.45%
Delaware Climate Solutions R
FFAFX84.52-0.42
-0.49%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
SMXAX20.66-0.24
-1.15%
SEI Extended Market Index A (SIIT)

MC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MC
1D Price
Change %
MC100%
-2.09%
PIPR - MC
80%
Closely correlated
-2.85%
EVR - MC
80%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
LAZ - MC
75%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
JEF - MC
73%
Closely correlated
-3.13%
PWP - MC
72%
Closely correlated
-1.45%
More

TREE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TREE has been loosely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TREE jumps, then MC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TREE
1D Price
Change %
TREE100%
+0.85%
MC - TREE
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
JEF - TREE
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.13%
EVR - TREE
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
PJT - TREE
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.79%
PIPR - TREE
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.85%
More