MC
Price
$78.41
Change
-$0.80 (-1.01%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.79B
13 days until earnings call
VIRT
Price
$37.43
Change
+$0.27 (+0.73%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.83B
Earnings call today
Ad is loading...

MC vs VIRT

Header iconMC vs VIRT Comparison
Open Charts MC vs VIRTBanner chart's image
Moelis & Company
Price$78.41
Change-$0.80 (-1.01%)
Volume$11.56K
Capitalization3.79B
Virtu Financial
Price$37.43
Change+$0.27 (+0.73%)
Volume$33.51K
Capitalization1.83B
MC vs VIRT Comparison Chart
Loading...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VIRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MC vs. VIRT commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MC is a Hold and VIRT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (MC: $78.49 vs. VIRT: $37.41)
Brand notoriety: MC and VIRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MC: 127% vs. VIRT: 86%
Market capitalization -- MC: $3.79B vs. VIRT: $1.83B
MC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.79B. VIRT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVIRT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VIRT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, VIRT is a better buy in the long-term than MC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VIRT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VIRT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VIRT is a better buy in the short-term than MC.

Price Growth

MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +4.26% price change this week, while VIRT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +3.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

MC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

VIRT is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.11% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MC($3.79B) has a higher market cap than VIRT($1.84B). MC has higher P/E ratio than VIRT: MC (82.58) vs VIRT (14.82). MC YTD gains are higher at: 6.240 vs. VIRT (4.849). VIRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.05B vs. MC (-32.04M). VIRT has more cash in the bank: 820M vs. MC (186M). MC has less debt than VIRT: MC (216M) vs VIRT (5.13B). VIRT has higher revenues than MC: VIRT (2.29B) vs MC (855M).
MCVIRTMC / VIRT
Capitalization3.79B1.84B206%
EBITDA-32.04M1.05B-3%
Gain YTD6.2404.849129%
P/E Ratio82.5814.82557%
Revenue855M2.29B37%
Total Cash186M820M23%
Total Debt216M5.13B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MC vs VIRT: Fundamental Ratings
MC
VIRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2120
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1824
SMR RATING
1..100
6558
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9717
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VIRT's Valuation (26) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (27). This means that VIRT’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

MC's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VIRT (24). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to VIRT’s over the last 12 months.

VIRT's SMR Rating (58) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (65). This means that VIRT’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

VIRT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (41). This means that VIRT’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

VIRT's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for MC (97). This means that VIRT’s stock grew significantly faster than MC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCVIRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VIRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TWUIX102.561.39
+1.37%
American Century Ultra® I
THVRX25.820.16
+0.62%
Thornburg International Equity R4
HGHFX39.720.02
+0.05%
Hartford Healthcare F
BGCWX14.53-0.02
-0.11%
Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap 2
IMACX9.39-0.06
-0.63%
Macquarie Multi-Asset Income C

MC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MC
1D Price
Change %
MC100%
-0.91%
EVR - MC
81%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
PIPR - MC
80%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
LAZ - MC
77%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
HLI - MC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
PWP - MC
72%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
More

VIRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIRT has been loosely correlated with VOYA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIRT jumps, then VOYA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VIRT
1D Price
Change %
VIRT100%
+0.67%
VOYA - VIRT
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
MC - VIRT
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
RJF - VIRT
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
LAZ - VIRT
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
SF - VIRT
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
More