MCAA
Price
$11.39
Change
-$0.12 (-1.04%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
WAVS
Price
$10.99
Change
-$0.01 (-0.09%)
Updated
Dec 18, 10:41 AM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

MCAA vs WAVS

Header iconMCAA vs WAVS Comparison
Open Charts MCAA vs WAVSBanner chart's image
Mountain & Co I Acquisition
Price$11.39
Change-$0.12 (-1.04%)
Volume$8.22K
CapitalizationN/A
Western Acquisition Ventures
Price$10.99
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
Volume$764
CapitalizationN/A
MCAA vs WAVS Comparison Chart
Loading...
MCAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WAVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCAA vs. WAVS commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCAA is a Hold and WAVS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (MCAA: $11.39 vs. WAVS: $11.00)
Brand notoriety: MCAA and WAVS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCAA: 59% vs. WAVS: 9%
Market capitalization -- MCAA: $198.45M vs. WAVS: $37.84M
MCAA [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $198.45M. WAVS’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $37.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCAA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWAVS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCAA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WAVS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCAA is a better buy in the long-term than WAVS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCAA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAVS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCAA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • WAVS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCAA is a better buy in the short-term than WAVS.

Price Growth

MCAA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WAVS (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +1.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCAA is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

WAVS is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.30% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCAA($198M) has a higher market cap than WAVS($37.8M). WAVS YTD gains are higher at: 1.289 vs. MCAA (0.796). WAVS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.23M vs. MCAA (-2.16M). WAVS has more cash in the bank: 303K vs. MCAA (91.6K). WAVS has less debt than MCAA: WAVS (202K) vs MCAA (3.48M). MCAA (0) and WAVS (0) have equivalent revenues.
MCAAWAVSMCAA / WAVS
Capitalization198M37.8M524%
EBITDA-2.16M-1.23M176%
Gain YTD0.7961.28962%
P/E Ratio46.43N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash91.6K303K30%
Total Debt3.48M202K1,722%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCAAWAVS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
6%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MCAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WAVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASRIX8.02-0.02
-0.25%
Invesco Global Real Estate Income R5
PNORX118.40-0.45
-0.38%
Putnam Sustainable Leaders R
STREX22.33-0.17
-0.76%
Sterling Capital Equity Income R6
HMCRX15.04-0.15
-0.99%
Harbor Mid Cap Retirement
INSAX21.80-0.31
-1.40%
Catalyst Insider Buying A

MCAA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCAA has been loosely correlated with WAVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCAA jumps, then WAVS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCAA
1D Price
Change %
MCAA100%
N/A
WAVS - MCAA
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EMCG - MCAA
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LATG - MCAA
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
HYAC - MCAA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADMG - MCAA
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WAVS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WAVS has been loosely correlated with QOMOU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WAVS jumps, then QOMOU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WAVS
1D Price
Change %
WAVS100%
N/A
QOMOU - WAVS
58%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WAVSU - WAVS
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GDSTU - WAVS
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MCAA - WAVS
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IVCAU - WAVS
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More