MCD | QSR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MCD's Valuation (20) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (22). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.
QSR's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCD (84). This means that QSR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCD’s over the last 12 months.
MCD's SMR Rating (7) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (29). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.
QSR's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MCD (63). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to MCD’s over the last 12 months.
QSR's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MCD (72). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to MCD’s over the last 12 months.
| MCD | QSR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 1 day ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 42% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 44% | 12 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 36% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MCD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while QSR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MCD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QSR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
MCD (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.12% price change this week, while QSR (@Restaurants) price change was +1.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.89%.
MCD is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
QSR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.