MCD
Price
$272.54
Change
-$3.16 (-1.15%)
Updated
Aug 13, 03:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
195.1B
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YUM
Price
$152.54
Change
+$2.20 (+1.46%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
41.03B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCD vs YUM

MCD vs YUM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? McDonald's (MCD) vs. Yum! Brands (YUM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MCD operates the largest global quick-service restaurant network with a focus on core burger and breakfast offerings, while YUM manages a diversified portfolio including KFC, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell across multiple cuisines.
  • Both companies have shown resilience in recent market activity amid shifting consumer dining preferences and economic pressures on discretionary spending.
  • MCD typically demonstrates more consistent revenue stability due to its scale and franchise-heavy model compared to YUM's multi-brand approach.
  • Recent weeks have highlighted varying impacts from inflation, labor costs, and international expansion efforts on each company's performance metrics.
  • Sector exposure remains concentrated in consumer discretionary and restaurants, with both stocks sensitive to broader economic sentiment and commodity price fluctuations.
  • Relative momentum has been influenced by earnings reports and operational updates, creating distinct trade-offs in growth potential versus defensive characteristics.

Introduction

McDonald's Corporation (MCD) and Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) represent two leading players in the global quick-service restaurant industry. This comparison examines their business models, recent market behavior, and relative positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating opportunities within the consumer discretionary sector. The analysis is particularly relevant for those focused on sector rotation strategies, dividend-oriented portfolios, or assessing resilience during periods of economic uncertainty. By reviewing observable performance factors and structural differences, market participants can better understand potential trade-offs between scale-driven stability and multi-brand diversification.

MCD Overview and Recent Performance

McDonald's Corporation is the world's largest quick-service restaurant chain, operating primarily through a franchise model that emphasizes standardized operations, menu innovation, and global brand recognition. In recent weeks, MCD has exhibited measured stock behavior influenced by ongoing consumer value-seeking trends and adjustments to promotional strategies. Key developments include continued international expansion efforts and responses to input cost pressures, which have shaped market sentiment. The company's scale provides a buffer against volatility, though performance has reflected broader industry challenges related to same-store sales trends in certain regions. Overall, recent market activity underscores MCD's position as a defensive holding within the restaurant space.

YUM Overview and Recent Performance

Yum! Brands, Inc. operates a portfolio of iconic restaurant brands including KFC, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell, with a significant emphasis on international markets and franchise partnerships. In recent weeks, YUM has experienced stock movements tied to operational updates across its diverse concepts and adaptations to varying consumer preferences by cuisine category. Developments such as targeted menu changes and growth initiatives in emerging markets have contributed to sentiment. The multi-brand structure introduces both diversification benefits and execution complexities, with performance reflecting sensitivity to regional economic conditions. Recent market activity highlights YUM's efforts to balance innovation with cost management in a competitive environment.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section featuring select AI trading bots from its extensive library of hundreds of bots that trade thousands of different tickers. Only the highest-performing and most suitable bots for prevailing market conditions are featured in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many demonstrating win rates between 60% and 85% alongside varying profit factors and drawdown profiles depending on the specific bot and ticker set. These systems differ significantly in approach, allowing users to align selections with individual risk tolerance and market views. For additional details on current trending options, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MCD benefits from unmatched global scale and a highly franchised model that supports predictable royalty streams, contrasting with YUM's multi-concept portfolio that offers greater cuisine diversification but potentially higher operational complexity. Growth drivers for MCD center on core menu optimization and digital initiatives, while YUM leverages brand-specific innovations across chicken, pizza, and Mexican-inspired offerings. Recent momentum has shown MCD maintaining steadier trajectories amid economic headwinds, whereas YUM exhibits more variability linked to individual brand performance. Risk factors include shared exposure to labor and commodity costs, though MCD's size may confer relative resilience. Market sentiment reflects both companies' positioning in the consumer discretionary sector, with trade-offs evident between MCD's defensive profile and YUM's potential for broader upside through diversification.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, operational stability, and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to MCD. This assessment stems from its demonstrated resilience and scale advantages that have supported more consistent performance patterns compared to YUM's diversified but potentially more variable exposure. The evaluation remains probabilistic and subject to evolving market conditions rather than a definitive outlook.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MCD vs. YUM commentary
Aug 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCD is a Buy and YUM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2026
Stock price -- (MCD: $275.70 vs. YUM: $150.34)
Brand notoriety: MCD and YUM are both notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCD: 91% vs. YUM: 112%
Market capitalization -- MCD: $195.1B vs. YUM: $41.03B
MCD [@Restaurants] is valued at $195.1B. YUM’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $41.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $195.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileYUM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • YUM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, YUM is a better buy in the long-term than MCD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • YUM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCD is a better buy in the short-term than YUM.

Price Growth

MCD (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.62% price change this week, while YUM (@Restaurants) price change was -1.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCD is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

YUM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+3.97% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCD($195B) has a higher market cap than YUM($41B). MCD has higher P/E ratio than YUM: MCD (22.40) vs YUM (18.93). YUM YTD gains are higher at: 0.325 vs. MCD (-8.674). MCD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15B vs. YUM (2.89B). MCD has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. YUM (689M). YUM has less debt than MCD: YUM (12B) vs MCD (54.9B). MCD has higher revenues than YUM: MCD (27.4B) vs YUM (8.49B).
MCDYUMMCD / YUM
Capitalization195B41B476%
EBITDA15B2.89B518%
Gain YTD-8.6740.325-2,667%
P/E Ratio22.4018.93118%
Revenue27.4B8.49B323%
Total Cash1.17B689M170%
Total Debt54.9B12B458%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCD vs YUM: Fundamental Ratings
MCD
YUM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1652
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5434
SMR RATING
1..100
58
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6062
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6584
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCD's Valuation (24) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (42). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MCD (54). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to MCD’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's SMR Rating (5) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (8). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (62). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (84). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCDYUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YUM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LRCX326.1114.70
+4.72%
Lam Research Corp
LW53.110.52
+0.99%
Lamb Weston Holdings
LOOP0.66N/A
+0.38%
Loop Industries
INVA20.810.06
+0.29%
Innoviva
TMCI4.750.01
+0.21%
Treace Medical Concepts

YUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUM has been loosely correlated with MCD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUM jumps, then MCD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUM
1D Price
Change %
YUM100%
+3.86%
MCD - YUM
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
FRSH - YUM
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.72%
DPZ - YUM
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
YUMC - YUM
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
DRI - YUM
33%
Poorly correlated
+4.01%
More