Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDCX vs RNWAX
MCDCX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts MCDCX vs RNWAX
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Inv C
Price$21.13
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
American Funds New World R1
Price$85.50
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.59B
MCDCX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDCX vs. RNWAX commentary
Aug 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDCX is a Buy and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. MCDCX (2.17B). MCDCX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: MCDCX (1.11) vs RNWAX (0.00). MCDCX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: MCDCX (31 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). MCDCX (2.09) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). MCDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. RNWAX (37.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDCX: RNWAX (250) vs MCDCX (1000). RNWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.87 vs. MCDCX (10.81). RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.36 vs. MCDCX (2.57).
| MCDCX | RNWAX | MCDCX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.66 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.66 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.186 | 16.121 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 70.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.81 | 14.87 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.94 | 31.72 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.57 | 21.36 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.43 | 66.39 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement