Ad is loading...
MCDFX vs MIMFX
MCDFX vs MIMFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MIMFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$12.17
Change+$0.18 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
AMG Veritas China I
Price$14.52
Change+$0.37 (+2.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.05M
MCDFX vs MIMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MIMFX commentary
Apr 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and MIMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. MIMFX (39M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MIMFX: MCDFX (3.57) vs MIMFX (1.33). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MIMFX: MCDFX (15 years) vs MIMFX (14 years). MCDFX (1.17) and MIMFX (1.12) have similar cost to investors . MIMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. MCDFX (27.30). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIMFX: MCDFX (2500) vs MIMFX (100000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.92 vs. MIMFX (4.94). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.62 vs. MIMFX (-49.79).
| MCDFX | MIMFX | MCDFX / MIMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.93 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.12 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.048 | 1.823 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 39M | 241% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 1.33 | 269% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.92 | 4.94 | 423% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.62 | -20.28 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.62 | -49.79 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.09 | -67.58 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers