Ad is loading...
MCDFX vs MIMFX
MCDFX vs MIMFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MIMFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$12.85
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
AMG Veritas China I
Price$15.58
Change-$0.07 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.75M
MCDFX vs MIMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MIMFX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and MIMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. MIMFX (41.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MIMFX: MCDFX (3.72) vs MIMFX (1.40). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MIMFX: MCDFX (15 years) vs MIMFX (14 years). MIMFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). MIMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIMFX: MCDFX (2500) vs MIMFX (100000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.66 vs. MIMFX (3.47). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.06 vs. MIMFX (-50.95).
| MCDFX | MIMFX | MCDFX / MIMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.93 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.27 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.806 | 9.257 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 41.8M | 225% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.72 | 1.40 | 265% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.66 | 3.47 | 481% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.49 | -7.15 | -91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.06 | -50.95 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.78 | -64.06 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers