Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCEMX vs RNWAX
MCEMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts MCEMX vs RNWAX
Martin Currie Emerging Markets IS
Price$14.42
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets320.24M
American Funds New World R1
Price$84.93
Change+$0.11 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.07B
MCEMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCEMX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCEMX is a StrongBuy and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. MCEMX (320M). MCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: MCEMX (0.62) vs RNWAX (0.00). MCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: MCEMX (10 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than MCEMX (0.83). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. MCEMX (19.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCEMX: RNWAX (250) vs MCEMX (1000000). RNWAX (8.50) and MCEMX (8.45) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.08 vs. MCEMX (13.61).
| MCEMX | RNWAX | MCEMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.66 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.66 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.489 | 15.347 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 320M | 70.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.45 | 8.50 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.89 | 37.98 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.61 | 24.08 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.42 | 59.81 | 104% |