Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCEMX vs RNWHX
MCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MCEMX vs RNWHX
Martin Currie Emerging Markets IS
Price$14.42
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets320.24M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.13
Change+$0.12 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.07B
MCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCEMX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. MCEMX (320M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than MCEMX: RNWHX (0.99) vs MCEMX (0.62). MCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MCEMX (10 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MCEMX (0.83) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. MCEMX (19.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs MCEMX (1000000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.61 vs. MCEMX (8.45). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 28.90 vs. MCEMX (13.61).
| MCEMX | RNWHX | MCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.72 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.72 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.489 | 15.930 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 320M | 70.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.99 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.45 | 9.61 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.89 | 40.84 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.61 | 28.90 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement