Ad is loading...
MCEMX vs RNWHX
MCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MCEMX vs RNWHX
Martin Currie Emerging Markets IS
Price$12.94
Change+$0.15 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.22M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$77.82
Change+$0.84 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.47B
MCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCEMX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 61.5B vs. MCEMX (305M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than MCEMX: RNWHX (1.12) vs MCEMX (0.60). MCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MCEMX (10 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). MCEMX (0.83) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. MCEMX (19.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs MCEMX (1000000). MCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.46 vs. RNWHX (2.65). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 39.59 vs. MCEMX (21.64).
| MCEMX | RNWHX | MCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.72 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.72 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.750 | 2.368 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 61.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.12 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.46 | 2.65 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.51 | 13.21 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.64 | 39.59 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...