Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCEMX vs RNWHX
MCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MCEMX vs RNWHX
Martin Currie Emerging Markets IS
Price$14.36
Change+$0.11 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets321.98M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$87.45
Change+$0.90 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.99B
MCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCEMX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 69B vs. MCEMX (322M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than MCEMX: RNWHX (1.04) vs MCEMX (0.57). MCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MCEMX (10 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MCEMX (0.83) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. MCEMX (19.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs MCEMX (1000000). MCEMX (11.56) and RNWHX (11.19) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 35.11 vs. MCEMX (20.18).
| MCEMX | RNWHX | MCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.72 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.72 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.454 | 15.036 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 322M | 69B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.04 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.56 | 11.19 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.89 | 35.35 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.18 | 35.11 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement