MCFT
Price
$18.36
Change
-$0.10 (-0.54%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
404.04M
17 days until earnings call
OSW
Price
$19.59
Change
+$0.10 (+0.51%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.35B
38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MCFT vs OSW

Header iconMCFT vs OSW Comparison
Open Charts MCFT vs OSWBanner chart's image
MasterCraft Boat Holdings
Price$18.36
Change-$0.10 (-0.54%)
Volume$54.18K
Capitalization404.04M
OneSpaWorld Holdings
Price$19.59
Change+$0.10 (+0.51%)
Volume$483.02K
Capitalization1.35B
MCFT vs OSW Comparison Chart
Loading...
MCFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCFT vs. OSW commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCFT is a Hold and OSW is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (MCFT: $18.36 vs. OSW: $19.59)
Brand notoriety: MCFT: Notable vs. OSW: Not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCFT: 64% vs. OSW: 98%
Market capitalization -- MCFT: $404.04M vs. OSW: $1.35B
MCFT [@Recreational Products] is valued at $404.04M. OSW’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $1.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCFT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOSW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OSW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCFT is a better buy in the long-term than OSW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCFT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OSW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OSW is a better buy in the short-term than MCFT.

Price Growth

MCFT (@Recreational Products) experienced а +3.20% price change this week, while OSW (@Recreational Products) price change was +4.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCFT is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

OSW is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+0.21% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSW($1.35B) has a higher market cap than MCFT($404M). OSW has higher P/E ratio than MCFT: OSW (1333.00) vs MCFT (7.14). OSW YTD gains are higher at: -1.558 vs. MCFT (-3.723). MCFT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 90M vs. OSW (38.9M). MCFT has more cash in the bank: 109M vs. OSW (27.7M). MCFT has less debt than OSW: MCFT (51.4M) vs OSW (171M). OSW has higher revenues than MCFT: OSW (794M) vs MCFT (537M).
MCFTOSWMCFT / OSW
Capitalization404M1.35B30%
EBITDA90M38.9M231%
Gain YTD-3.723-1.558239%
P/E Ratio7.141333.001%
Revenue537M794M68%
Total Cash109M27.7M394%
Total Debt51.4M171M30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCFT vs OSW: Fundamental Ratings
MCFT
OSW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
590
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8075
SMR RATING
1..100
9067
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5742
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OSW's Valuation (71) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MCFT (96) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew similarly to MCFT’s over the last 12 months.

OSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MCFT (80) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew similarly to MCFT’s over the last 12 months.

OSW's SMR Rating (67) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MCFT (90) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew similarly to MCFT’s over the last 12 months.

OSW's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MCFT (57) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew similarly to MCFT’s over the last 12 months.

MCFT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for OSW (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MCFT’s stock grew significantly faster than OSW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCFTOSW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MCFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USAUX68.430.75
+1.11%
Victory Aggressive Growth
GFVIX15.940.11
+0.69%
Goldman Sachs Focused Value Inv
HFCVX20.840.13
+0.63%
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Investor
MQGIX47.850.21
+0.44%
MFS International Growth I
HIAOX16.430.07
+0.43%
Hartford International Opp HLS IA

MCFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCFT has been closely correlated with MBUU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCFT jumps, then MBUU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCFT
1D Price
Change %
MCFT100%
-0.54%
MBUU - MCFT
71%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
BC - MCFT
68%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
WGO - MCFT
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.45%
LCII - MCFT
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
PII - MCFT
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.07%
More

OSW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSW has been loosely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OSW jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OSW
1D Price
Change %
OSW100%
+0.51%
CUK - OSW
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.27%
MPX - OSW
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
LCII - OSW
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
MCFT - OSW
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
JOUT - OSW
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
More