MCFT
Price
$15.35
Change
-$0.35 (-2.23%)
Updated
Apr 7, 02:46 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
404.04M
30 days until earnings call
PLBY
Price
$0.99
Change
-$0.01 (-1.00%)
Updated
Apr 7, 02:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
76.28M
30 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MCFT vs PLBY

Header iconMCFT vs PLBY Comparison
Open Charts MCFT vs PLBYBanner chart's image
MasterCraft Boat Holdings
Price$15.35
Change-$0.35 (-2.23%)
Volume$200
Capitalization404.04M
PLBY Group
Price$0.99
Change-$0.01 (-1.00%)
Volume$800
Capitalization76.28M
MCFT vs PLBY Comparison Chart
Loading...
MCFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCFT vs. PLBY commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCFT is a Buy and PLBY is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MCFT: $15.70 vs. PLBY: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: MCFT: Notable vs. PLBY: Not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCFT: 244% vs. PLBY: 76%
Market capitalization -- MCFT: $404.04M vs. PLBY: $76.28M
MCFT [@Recreational Products] is valued at $404.04M. PLBY’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $76.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCFT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLBY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLBY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCFT is a better buy in the long-term than PLBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCFT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLBY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PLBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLBY is a better buy in the short-term than MCFT.

Price Growth

MCFT (@Recreational Products) experienced а -8.93% price change this week, while PLBY (@Recreational Products) price change was -6.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -6.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCFT is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

PLBY is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-6.72% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCFT($404M) has a higher market cap than PLBY($76.3M). MCFT YTD gains are higher at: -17.672 vs. PLBY (-31.774). MCFT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 90M vs. PLBY (-206.5M). MCFT has more cash in the bank: 109M vs. PLBY (20M). MCFT has less debt than PLBY: MCFT (51.4M) vs PLBY (221M). MCFT has higher revenues than PLBY: MCFT (537M) vs PLBY (230M).
MCFTPLBYMCFT / PLBY
Capitalization404M76.3M529%
EBITDA90M-206.5M-44%
Gain YTD-17.672-31.77456%
P/E Ratio7.14N/A-
Revenue537M230M233%
Total Cash109M20M545%
Total Debt51.4M221M23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCFT: Fundamental Ratings
MCFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCFTPLBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MCFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLDCY2.78-0.06
-2.11%
Henderson Land Development Co., Ltd.
SVNDY13.65-0.30
-2.15%
Seven & I Holdings Co., Ltd.
VIGL1.56-0.11
-6.59%
Vigil Neuroscience
JUSHF0.26-0.02
-6.68%
Jushi Holdings Inc.
GNGBY19.00-1.80
-8.65%
Getinge AB

MCFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCFT has been closely correlated with MBUU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCFT jumps, then MBUU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCFT
1D Price
Change %
MCFT100%
-4.33%
MBUU - MCFT
71%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
BC - MCFT
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
WGO - MCFT
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
LCII - MCFT
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
PII - MCFT
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
More

PLBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLBY and CUKPF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLBY and CUKPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLBY
1D Price
Change %
PLBY100%
-2.34%
CUKPF - PLBY
29%
Poorly correlated
-13.14%
LCII - PLBY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
YETI - PLBY
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
MCFT - PLBY
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.33%
PRKS - PLBY
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
More